Epstein Secrets

2:44 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Case 9:08-cv,80736-KA.ocurnen\ 48-5 Emered on FLSD Do.03/21/2011 I I :sentenced not later y,an October 26, 2007-. the UnitedjStates bas 110 objection to J;:pstein seJfsreporting to begin ~rving hls sentence ·not later than January 4, 2008. • 12. Epstein agrees that.he will no

lty and to ·provide compensation in the tQanner aescribed ab()ye, ifEpsteirt successfully fulfills allt>fthe tenns ~ _conditi9M of this agreement, the United Stat~s 1,1~0 agrees that it will niH institute: BilY criminal charges against any potential ~~onspirators ofEpstein, inclµding but not limited toi Sarah Ke

offense includcs; ;but is net limitadto; a conviction liy a foderabor miUtary'tribunal,-including courts-martial conducted by the Armed Forcos of tho United Status,, >and includes a conviction-orentry of a ploa of',guilty or nolo contendere resulting in a-sanctiun in anyistato of dio United-States or other juris

he gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. Ifthe United States receives a Freedom ofInformation Act request or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to Epstein

ll.· .. attempt to obstruct justice, or ... to threaten, injure, or intimidate, a prospective witness or juror." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(t)(2)(B); see also United States v. Friedman, 837 F.2d 48 (2d Cir. 1988). The Bail Reform Act lists four factors to be considered in the detention analysis: (1) the nature and circ

text of the agreement purports to bind “the Government.” See Annabi, Tl\ F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (“Defendant’s argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it

e impeachment issue, and after considering the problem, Villafana agreed with the agents' concerns. Villafana raised those concerns with the USAO's Professional Responsibility Officer in Oct9ber 2007 after the agents brought the issue to her attention, and she ultimately raised the issue with Sloman and Acosta as well, neither of

Marie Villafafia Assistant United States Attorney cc: Robert Josefsberg, Esq. [Defendant's attorney] EFTA00190717 U.S. Department of Justice United Slates Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 3340! (561)820-871 t Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 [

15 [VICTIM'S NAME] NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM [DATE] PAGE 2 or 3 2. If you elect to file suit against [Defendant] pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, [Defendant] will not contest the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his

Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: s/A. Marie Villafana A. Marie Villafaila Assistant United States Attorney cc: Dexter Lee, AUSA and Professional Responsibility Officer Karen Atkinson, AUSA EFTA00190714 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Su

55 [VICTIM'S NAME] NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM [DATE] PAOE 2 OF 3 2. If you elect to file suit against [Defendant] pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, [Defendant] will not contest the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his

guidance. If ou need any additional information, please contact me at my office, or on my cell phone at trU bat Enclosures cc: , AUSA AUSA and Professional Responsibility Officer AUSA Roy Black, Esq., Counsel to the Putative Defendant Michael Tein, Esq., Counsel to the Putative Defendant In addition to the general rules re

s of each victim, and have worked to fulfill my obligations to advise and protect them in accordance with the law and my duties as representative of the United States. I would add that the legal team from Mr. Josefsberg's firm has also acted in an exemplary fashion, focusing on the mental health of the victims and

lexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney Enclosures cc: Stuart S. Mermelstein (via Federal Express) AUSA and Professional Responsibility Officer AUSA The Agreement contains a confidentiality provision and is governed by a Protective Order entered by the U.S. District Court for the Southern

tribunal . . ." In connection with litigation filed by two victims against the U.S. Attorney's Office, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra ordered the United States to make available to identified victims a copy of the Non-Prosecution Agreement subject to a Protective Order. ag During the hearing, Judge Marra ma

tates Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney Enclosures cc: Stuart S. Mermelstein (via United States Mail) (w/encl.) Dexter Lee, AUSA and Professional Responsibility Officer (w/encl.) Karen Atkinson, AUSA (w/encl.) See Attachment 1. See Attachments 2 and 3. F3The Agreement contains a confidentiality provision and is g