Epstein Secrets

documents, the act of producing those documents is testimonial. Two Supreme Court precedents, Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976) and United States v. Hubbell, as well as Hubbell's progeny, United States v. Ponds, 454 F.3d 313 (D.C. Cir. 2006), inform the determination of whether a production of

oenaed documents, the act of producing those documents is testimonial. Two Supreme Court precedents, Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976) and United States v. Hubbell, as well as Hubbell's progeny, United States v. Ponds, 454 F.3d 313 (D.C. Cir. 2006), inform the determination of whether a product

o Supreme Court precedents, Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976) and United States v. Hubbell, as well as Hubbell's progeny, United States v. Ponds, 454 F.3d 313 (D.C. Cir. 2006), inform the determination of whether a production of documents in response to a subpoena has a testimonial character.

enaed documents, the act of producing those documents is testimonial. Two Supreme Court precedents, Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976) and United States v. Hubbell, as well as Hubbell's progeny, United States v. Ponds, 454 F.3d 313 ( Cir. 2006), inform the determination of whether a production of do

64 COVINGTON The Honorable Richard Burr The Honorable Mark R. Warner May 22, 2017 Page 5 the existence of any particular responsive documents. See United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 613 n.12 (1984) ("The most plausible inference to be drawn from the broad-sweeping subpoenas is that the Government [is] unab

the government has failed to show with reasonable particularity that it knew of the existence and location of most of the subpoenaed documents ... Ponds' act of production was sufficiently testimonial to implicate his right against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution: Id

spective. Based upon the residence of the account holder, account type, or product type, some interest andor deiClend payments may not be sublets to United Slates (US) and, Puerto Rico (PR) income taxes. The dent monthly statement is not intended to to used and cannot be reied upon fa tar purposes. Clients sh

erveclive. Bated upon the residence of the account holder, account type, or product 1$2t. Same interest andOe dvidend payments may not be subject to United Stares (US) ardor Puerto Rico (1R) income ta,es. The (lent retinues statement is not Intended 10 be used and earnot be relied upon for tat purposes. Clien

ni lots and *storm* pram. lot re eat <imbued !odor*, one amagod et the • trade dae- colarm presents the aginal balsa lno bra-date • Callable nark*, Ponds and piefeeted stock that the AAA( (Alt for ealyerderemonted be soleard wore* by lot tom annoy al secants of that nor heti in out nano et at rwmiwe