Epstein Secrets

dance with Paragraph 7B, please provide me with a proposed written submission to the Special Master by Monday afternoon. Finally, as you are aware, yhe United States has been ordered to produce the Non-Prosecution Agreement. In accordance with that Order, we will produce the September Agreement with the October A

nder Acosta United States Attorney cc: Jack Goldber er, Esq. , Esq. Assistant United States Attorney EFTA00183055 U.S. Department of Justice United Stales Attorney Southern District of Florida TO: FAX NO. A. Mark PiIktfaila 500 S. Australian Ave, 4th Floor West Palm Reach, Florida 33401 (561) 820

those conditions is Epstein's agreement that the subject Jane Does, while minors, were victims of a violation of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code Section 2255, and that they "will have the same rights to proceed under Section 2255 as [they] would have had if Mr. Epstein had been tried and

mate, including but not limited to, eligibility for gain time credit based on standard rules and regulations that apply in the State of Florida. At the United States' request, Epstein agrees to provide an accounting of the gain time be earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The patties anticipate that t

Kuvin Michael J. Pike September 18, 2009 4D09-2554 Palm Beach 502006CF009454AXXM8 and 502008CF009381AXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN I. STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL. ttayyt BEUTTENMULLER, Clerk Fourth District Court of Appeal Sharon R. Bock, Clerk Jane Kreusler-Walsh Diana Martin State Attorney-P.B. James

d-2(a). See, CL Superseding Indictment, United States v. Nexus Technologies, et al., No. 08-cr-522 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 2009), ECF No. 106 [hereinafter Uzited States v. Nexus Technologies] (private US. company and corporate executives charged with violating FCPA for bribes paid in Vietnam), available at http ://ww

(h) Definitions For purposes of this section: (1) The term “domestic concern” means— (A) any individual who is a citizen, national, or resident of the United States; and (B) any corporation, partnership, association, joint-stock company, business trust, unincorporated organization, or sole proprietorship which h

omplaints/20 10/comp2 1454.pdf; Criminal Information at 8, United States v. Innospec Inc., No. 10-cr-61 (D.D.C. Mar. 17,2010), ECF No. 1 [hereinafter Uvited States v. Jnnospec], available at http ://www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fcpa/ cases/innospec- inc/03-17- 10innospec-info.pdf. 80 See Complaint, SEC v. In

oted that “[i]n interpreting what is lawful under the written laws and regulations’ ... the normal rules of legal construction would apply.” Jd. 143 See United States v. Kozeny, 582 FE Supp. 2d 535, 537-40 (S.D.NY. 2008). Likewise, the court found that a provision under Azeri law that relieved bribe payors of crimi

10), available at http:// www.whitehouse.gov/ sites/default/files/rss_viewer/ national_security_ strategy.pdf. 6 See, C85 INT’L CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, ET AL., CLEAN BUSINESS Is Goop BusINEss: THE BUSINESS CASE AGAINST CORRUPTION (2008), available at http ://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_ events/8.1/ c

or criminal liability or a waiver of any jarisdictional or other defense as to any person, whether or not her name appears oa the list provided by the United Slates. 11. Epstein shall use his best efforts to enter his guilty plea and be Page 4 of 7 P. 009/014 EFTA00233347 ..1N- 30-2008180O 10:06 P. CI 0/0

including but not limited to, eligibility for gain time credit based on standard rules and regulations that apply in the State of Florida. At the. United States' request, Epstein agrees to provide an accounting of the pin time be earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The patties anticipate that th

ns with the State Attorney's Office and to use his bestefforts to ensure compliance with thesepareedures, whichcompliancewilt bettor:may to satisfy the United States' interest. Epstein also understands that it is lds obligation to use his best efforts to convince the Judge of the 15th Judicial Circuit to accept Ep

ACH LAKES BLVD., WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 September 2, 2009 CASE NO.: 4D09-2554 L.T. No. : 20098CF009381A JEFFREY EPSTEIN 1. STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL. Appellant / Petitioner(s), BY ORDER OF THE COURT: Appellee I Respondent(s). ORDERED that appellee E.W.'s motion filed July 13, 2009, to file por

tpawc Stn,. Rawl &AWN, &NNW Polio Serail IhO:rxii MrvnlnrNlu U.S. Coss, Guard US. awrteneta aSwe US Minlak SoNee LIS. Paul Stake US. Scan &Wu US &may Leal Ny Coseor SOPS 04<r JUDGMENT CORM CI Count Myna/ CO Cain CM1d/rolSenknet Cf Ws* Ndsreat DI Dim .IN &down Neweidunekirg MV Mud

OF AMERICA vs. ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ, Defendant. CRIMINAL COVER SHEET 1. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Northern Region of the United States Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? Yes X No 2. Did this matter originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the United St

2-MM-I13327 FIELD DIVISION / SQUAD MIAMI / PB2 Date Prepared 10/28/2009 Planned Date of Operation 11/02/2009 TITLE OF CASE ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; ET AL; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE PROGRAM ASAC PH# SQUAD SSA PH# CASE AGENT/OFFICER PH# ALTERNATE CA/OFFICER PH# SITUATION / MISSION Type of Opaatio

o Robert Josefsberg, Esq. PODHURST ORSECK, PA 25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131 48' Lesley Groff c/o Mike Miller 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 49. Dave Rogers c/o Bruce Reinhart 505 S. Flagler Drive, Ste 300 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 50. c/o Adam Horowitz FARMER,

do Brad Edwards, Farmer Jaffe Weissing 425 North Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale FL 33301 30. 31. 32. do Adam Horowitz FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, ET AL. 425 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 2 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 33 * do Jack Scarola SEARCY DENNEY, ET AL. EFTA00798047 DESCRIPTION OF WITNESSES 2139

(212) 210-9444 Email:[email protected] Michael Campion Miller [ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED] Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue Of The Americas New York, NY, USA 10036 (212) 506-3900 Fax: (212) 506-3950 Email:[email protected] Justin Y.K. Chu [ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED] Steptoe & Johnson,

lemental privilege logs (DEs 216- f 329-1). The numbers following the colon are page ranges. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner(s) vs. BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ET AL., Respondent(s) CASE NO.: SC15-2286 SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1283 June 9, 2017, Decided NOTICE: DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINI

001) - III CERTIFICATION VINE CERTIFY: (I) That the above aircraft is owned by the undursgned applicant. who is a onion (including comorauon.) of Ihe United Staters (Poe wrens truM. give name of trustee: ) or CHECK ONE AS APPROPRIATE: a. 0 A resident alien. with alien reglataWan (Form 1-151 or Fonn 1-661) No.

APHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA 00248408 EFTA01331926 DOCUMENT LEVEL ANNOTATIONS FOR DOCUMENT ARE001149633 SEE DEC CONY N 5118267, CO18, PG 1, ET AL SDNY_GM_02761487 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00248409 EFTA01331927 SDNY_GM_02761488 SUBJECT TO PROTECT

DEOGRAPHER: This is tape number one to the videotape deposition of Mark Epstein in the matter of Jane Doe versus Jeffrey Epstein being held before the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida, case file number 08-80893. This deposition is being held at Esquire Deposition Solutions, One

nd Jane Doe Las Olas City Centre, Suite 1650 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 BY: BRAD J. EDWARDS, ESQ. LEOPOLD KUVIN, ET AL Attorneys for Plaintiff, BB 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 BY: ADAM LANGINO, ESQ. (via telephone) COHEN & GRES

ested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 17-1011 BUDHA ISMAIL JAM, ET AL., PETITIONERS U. INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT [

ining international peace and security. Anticipating that those and other international organi- zations would locate their headquarters in the United States, Congress passed the International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, 59 Stat. 669. The Act grants international organizations a set of privileges

maintaining international peace and security. Anticipating that those and other international organi- zations would locate their headquarters in the United States, Congress passed the International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, 59 Stat. 669. The Act grants international organizations a set of pri

Court to the rights in question. See Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U. S. 409, 427-430 (1968). Similarly, the Federal Tort Claims Act states that the "United States shall be liable" in tort "in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances." 28 U.S. C. $2674. That provisi