Epstein Secrets

ough such misconduct was, as we contend it is, inextricably intenwined with the credibility of the accusations being made against Mr. Epstein by the United States Attorney's Office in Miami ("USAO"). Moreover, CEOS did not assess the terms of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement now in effect, nor did CEOS revie

tors during the negotiations of a detbrred prosecution agreement. The consistent representations of key Government witnesses (such as Tatum Miller. Brittany Beale, Saige Gonzalez, and Jennifer Laduke) confirm the following critical points: rips!, there was no communication, telephonic or othcnvisc, that meets

ly, there was no force, coercion, fraud, violence, drugs, or even alcohol present in connection with Mr. Epstein's encounters with these women, Ms. Beale stated that "[Mr. Epstein] never tried to force me to do anything." Beale Tr. A at 12. These accounts are far from the usual testimony in sex slaver

pond to your e-mail or calls unle /or her supervisors advise him otherwise. Furthermore, you make reference to "our July 8 deadline." Respectfully, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("SDFL") has never agreed to any such deadline. Should you decide to provide the SD v additi

y points: First, there was no telephonic communication that met the requirements of § 2422(b). For example, as many other witnesses have stated, Ms. Beale testified in no unclear terms that there was never any discussion over the phone about her coming over to Mr. Epstein's home to engage in sexual ac

ugh such misconduct was, as we contend it is, inextricably intertwined with the credibility of the accusations being made against Mr. Epstein by the United States Attorney's Office in Miami ("USAO"). Moreover, CEOS did not assess the terms of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement now in effect, nor did CEOS revie

ly, there was no force, coercion, fraud, violence, drugs, or even alcohol present in connection with Mr. Epstein's encounters with these women, Ms. Beale stated that "[Mr. Epstein) never tried to force me to du anything." Tr. A et 12. These accounts are far from the usual testimony in sex slavery, In

pertain to events occurring after the arrest or indictment of an individual for the crime, and it will become the responsibility of the prosecuting United States Attorney's Office to ensure you are accorded those rights. You may also seek the advice of a private attorney with respect to these rights. The Vic

the VNS Internet site, you will be prompted to enter your last name (or business name) as currently contained in VNS. The name you should enter is Beale. If you have additional questions which involve this matter, please contact the office listed above. When you call, please provide the file number

6, 1998, at BS. 22 Victims' Rights Amendment. Hearing on S.J. Res. 6 Before the S. Judiciary Comm., 105th Cong. 64 (1997) (statement of Janet Reno, U.S. Att'y Gen.). 30 See www.nveap.org (last visted Dec. 30, 2007). 3! For a comprehensive history of victims' efforts to pass a constitutional amendment,

able to reflect the new role of victims throughout the Rules. Moreover, Congress intended the CVRA to be "a formula for success" and a "model for our States." + The only way the federal rules could serve as a model, I argued, was by fully implementing victims’ rights. I then proposed twenty-eight specific

witnesses."). 441 See, e.g., United States v. Pearson, 340 F.3d 459, 468 (7th Cir. 2003); United States v. Bejasa, 904 F.2d 137, 139 (2d Cir. 1990); United States v. Barrett, 766 F.2d 609, 617 (ist Cir. 1985); United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 910 (6th Cir. 1970). 342 631 F.2d 951, 954-55 (9th Cir.