Epstein Secrets

telephon·e, she declined to· d1scuss Epstein. - Nadia Marcinkova1 23, whose family in Yugoslavia Epstein paidmoneyto so that he could bring her to the United States to· be his "sex: sla.,ve;" two teenage girls· tplci police. One. gitl told :polite that Epstein instructed. Marciriko:va a:rtd het to kiss and have

ive co.uri.sel iri this matter." Marra quotedan equally pleasant note then-Pg.lrp ]?each County State Attorney 13;ircy Ifrischer sent to Assi~tc1nt U .S, Attorney Marie Viilafana:, who was the lead prosecutor in Epstein's case. "Glad We could get this worked out for feel.son~ l won't put in wrhing,

a, believing he would prosecute Epstein. He didn't. Reiter said he was heartened that 13 years later, Epstein will finally face justice. "Thankfully, U. S. Attorney Berman and the other authorities in New York have the good judgment to investigate and prosecute Epstein in the way that should have occurre

r grand jury proceedings because of the exceptional public interest in this case and the compelling circumstances supporting transparency. Carlson v. UnitedStates, 837 F.3d at 766 (“a district court has the inherent power to disclose [grand jury] materials in exceptional circumstances and . . . historic importa

ts First Amended Complaint against Dave Aronberg, the State Attorney for Palm Beach County, Florida, in his official capacity (“State Attorney”), and Sharon R. Bock, the Clerk of the Court for Palm Beach County, Florida, in her official capacity (“Court Clerk”), alleges as follows: JURISDICTION L This is an actio

0799528 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 36 of 101 Conclusion For the reasons set forth above and in the United States' Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Mauer Jurisdiction, the United States respectfully requests that this Court enter an order dismissing

tution. See In re W.R. Huff, 409 F.3d at 563. The statute pursuant to which Petitioners urge this Court to award restitution, however, does not make the United States liable for restitution for harms caused by others. Therefore, Petitioners are not entitled to restitution in this case. 5. Remaining Relief Request

STATE C FLORIDA • PALM BEACH COUNTY I hereby et. Jty that the Icregoing is a true copy or the record in my ntl•ce. THIS ( 7 OAY OF 3-M 20 I 2- SHARON R. BOCK CLERK RO DT TY CLERK Brad Edwards Florida Bar #542075 Page 12 of 12 EFTA00799545 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Dock

privileges in federal court pros. wsings " 1560 shall be governed by the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by the courts of the United States in the light of reason and experience." The privilege appellants assert, as stated in their motions to intervene, is based solely on state law. [FN

and jury than to protect from delay the progress of the trial after an indictment has been found." Id. at 327, 60 5.Q. at 542; see also Di Bella v. United States. 369 U.S. 121, 124, 82 S.Q. 654, 656-57, 7 L.P.d.2d 614 (1962) ("This insistence on finality and prohibition of piecemeal review discourage undue

the subject of the record sought. LT1P•I CVMI 11.11 EFTA00277537 CIRCUIT COURT CRIMINAL DIVISION P.O. Box 2906 West Palm Beach, FL 33402-2906 SHARON R. BOCK Clerk & Comptroller Palm Beach County I III !ill Ili' 'Ili ill a I ill in $2 FIRST C EFTA00277538 ELECTRONIC COURT REPORTING WITNESS LOG CAS

the United States, advised that her January 2001 record was the return from her London, England trip 'The April 2001 CBP record was her return to the United States' ould not recall her travel from advised that her United States March and May 2001 CPB records! Passport was Australia. turned over to the United

d jury than to protect from delay the progress of the trial after an indictment has been found." Id. at 327, 60 S. Cr. at 542; see also Di Bella v. United States. 369 U.S. 121, 124, 82 S.O. 654, 656-57, 7 L.Pd.2d 614 (1962) ("This insistence on finality and prohibition of piecemeal review discourage undue l

06 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. EFTA01699671 CIRCUIT COURT CRIMINAL DIVISION P.O. Box 2906 West Palm Beach, FL 33402-2906 SHARON R. BOCK Clerk & Comptroller Palm Beach County es a m eac , -6235 +15:112 $2.31 SEP 21 2006 US POSTAGE FIRST CLASS MAILED FROM 33401 011A04130012T7

fice, an event that did not occur until June 2008. DE 48 at 1 41 & Ex. Eat 5. 34 EFTA00208856 Conclusion For the reasons set forth above and in the United States' Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Mauer Jurisdiction, the United States respectfully requests that this Court enter an order dismissing

tution. See In re W.R. Huff, 409 F.3d at 563. The statute pursuant to which Petitioners urge this Court to award restitution, however, does not make the United States liable for restitution for harms caused by others. Therefore, Petitioners are not entitled to restitution in this case. 5. Remaining Relief Request

008. ...ualmil; STATE C FUNIDA • PALM BEACH COUNTY I "way u.,lty that the Ivegoing is a true copy Of the record in my nice. THIS II DAY OF .3- SHARON R. BOCK CLERK By OEM CLERK THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff 2028 Harrison Street - Suite 202 Hollywood, Flor

nsure oldie residency of defendant JEFFREY ESPSTON, because he hat residences in New York, Florida, Ncw Mexico, and also outside of the continental United Slates. 4. The defendant, ella was a resident of Florida. 13440 This tax was received by GM FAXMakes fax server. For more information, visit httpfiwww.

ded the complaint in this lawsuit on the uhove-numed defenchml. DATED on FUL21_2(108 , 2008 (SEAL) : .; to serve this sununons and a copy of SHARON R. BOCK Clerk & Comptroller P.O. Box 4687 West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-4807 CLERK. OF THE COURT AS DEPUTY CLER SHERI PAIGE This fax was received by

Court on 2 day of 2006. SHARON R. BOCK, Clerk (Circuit Court Seal) DALIAH H. WEISS Assistant State Attorney Deptdy Clerk this subpoena on the S da;:f71P0 I ,2006, and executed the same on the 4 day of 2006, by delivering a True Copy thereof to the within named witness in the County of Palm

7,14,4 54o: tt,..0 6:4 ... " 13 this Court on ...-2 day /606. WITNESS my hand and the seal f o ic-h- - ci 4 (Circuit Court**, trs' i 1 i SHARON R. BOCK. Clerk 4 is'...... .1 li it o 4 (t.„ .„ ; cot By DALIAH H. WEISS Assistant State Attorney - - - ece this subpoena on the day of X2006.

ness- Legal Meetings Name(s). address and telephone number of destination: Residence -9 East 71" St., New York, NY / LeggLmgglingth 1345 Avenue of Americas, 46Th floor New York, NY / DRS non - 629 Park Avenue, New York, NY Departure Date: 3/25/2010 Accompanied By: Staff Return Date: 3/26/2010 Method

FLORIDA - CRIMINAL DIVISION CASE NO: qt. ct-vcil ttn STATE OF FLORIDA vs. Cieefte) Dendant. FILED Circuit Criminal Department DEC 1 8 2909 SHARON R. BOCK Clerk & Comptroller Palm Beach County X.P1-4,1RDER ON MOTION 6 ) -c- THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon 4,01 ev."' The Court, having be

mate, including but not limited to, eligibility for gain time credit based on standard rules and regulations that apply in the State of Florida. At the United States' request, Epstein agrees to provide an accounting of the gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. Case No. 08.80736-CV•MARRA P-009

the COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 205 N. DIXIE HWY, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 "BE PREPARED TO PAY COURT COSTS AND FINES ASSESSED BY THE COURT AT THIS HEARING" SHARON R. BOCK, CLERK & COMPTROLLER VBUCKLEY DATED: JANUARY 28, 2008 BY: Deputy Clerk cc: STATE ATTORNEY JACK A GOLDBERGER , ESQ. CB / KITY DEPOSITOR: J GOLD

Nacre NO. Name/Number : JUL-27-2011 03:01PM FLED : Phaser 33001.7P StartTime Time Mode Page Result 246 07-27 03:00PM 00'31 ECM 003/003 CLR United Slates Attorney's Unite Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, IN. 33401-6235 DATE 7/42720c _area? WeavAatcit

cORDER ON MOTION US ) THIS MATTER comes before the Cotid upon DI . rvital-Ccr )04 Cf- 1,142 FILED Oiroult Criminal Department tics: 1 8 2009 SHARON R. BOCK Clerk & Comptroller Palm Beach County The Court, having been made aware that both counsel haVe agreed to said motion.. Accordingly, It is hereby.