Epstein Secrets

3047 Fax: (561) 802-1787 •If not applicable, enter "none? TobandblimotAO110 FORM ORD-227 JAN.86 EFTA00193088 08/16/2007 17:08 FAX 5618021787 USA0 WPB FL ID o01 TRANSMISSION OK st******************** **a TX REPORT *** *****************44tt TX/RX NO 0344 CONNECTION TEL 12129886192 SUB

ect until you are granted leave to depart by the court or by an officer acting on behalf of the court. This subpoena is issued upon application of the Urjt d States of America *If not applicable, enter 'none." Name, Address and Phone Number of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann Marie C.Villafatla, Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S

ranted leave to depart by the court or by an officer acting on behalf of the court. (BY) DEPUTY CLERK This subpoena is issued upon application of the U • ed States of America DATE: August August 16, 2007 Name, Address and Phone Number of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann Marie C. Villafafia, Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 So.

of Records Custodian: EFTA00193152 Un - (ed States District Cart •If not applicable, enter "none." This subpoena is issued upon application of the JJntted States of America SOUTHERN DISTRICTOF FLORIDA TO: Dan Tischler Airport Executive Towncar Service 2621 Exuma Road West Palm Beach, FL SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE

Rule 45(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2."Fees and mileage need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United States or an officer or agency thereof (Rule 45(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 17(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure) or on behalf of cert

re transfer records 03/06/2007 OLY-31 Western Union wire transfer records 03/06/2007 OLY-32 JP Morgan Chase bank records 03/06/2007 OLY-33 Thomas Rofrano billing statements, record of payments, appointment books, treatment notes and correspondence 3/13/2007 Page -3- EFTA00193071 GRAND JURY SUB

k that physical force against the person . . . or another may be used in t the course of committing the offense." 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). Post-Johnson v. United Sta , U.S. 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), a court might decide differently. See, e.g., Menendez Whitaker, 908 F.3d 467 (9'b Cir. 2018). Even if not a crime

considered for work release. At some point after the NPA was signed, USA Acosta was recused from the Epstein matter. AUSA John McMillan (still at USA0): Early in the investigation, I asked AUSA McMillan if he would serve as co-counsel on the case. Before I joined the West Palm Beach Office, AUSA M

rate contact with Epstein. (See Exhibit A-1.) One of the subpoenaed victims was Individual #28, who is referred to as Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe' United Stales litigation. When approached for an interview, Individual #28 refused to speak with the agents, and I remember S/A Kuyrkendall telling me that she fe

GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS SEALED ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO DISCLOSE GRAND JURY MATERIAL THIS MATTER has come before the Court on the United States' Sealed Application for Permission to Disclose Grand Jury Material and for Entry of a Protective Order. The Court has considered the Motion and find

views of various witnesses taken during state's investigation. 2/27/2007 Grand Jury Testimony of E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall 18 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Thomas Rofrano (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Johanna Sjoberg (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Christina (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007

nsel have had access to the subpoenaed computers since at least October 2005, when they were removed from Epstein's home, and they have known about the United States' attempts to locate those computers for at least two months, when a subpoena for the same items was served upon Paul Lavery, another private investig

n had standing to assert these challenges, the subpoenas are not unreasonable and do not violate any act of production privilege. For these reasons, the United States asks the Court to deny the Motion to Quash and to order the prompt production of the requested items and the witnesses' appearances before the Grand

papers of any kind. The notion that the Fifth Amendment rotects the privacy of papers originated in Boyd I United States , . . but our decision in Fisher United States , . .. sounded the death knell for Boyd . Several of Boyd 's express or implicit declarations [had] not stood the test of time, . . . and its privac

y, and, as shown by Attachment E to the Black Affidavit, Epstein was receiving professional chiropractic services from a licensed chiropractor, Dr. Thomas Rofrano. Epstein's counsel misstates the state charges pending against his client. The state grand jury returned a three-count indictment. Each count charg

nsel have had access to the subpoenaed computers since at least October 2005, when they were removed from Epstein's home, and they have known about the United States' attempts to locate those computers for at least two months, when a subpoena for the same items was served upon Paul Lavery, another private investig

n had standing to assert these challenges, the subpoenas are not unreasonable and do not violate any act of production privilege. For these reasons, the United States asks the Court to deny the Motion to Quash and to order the prompt production of the requested items and the witnesses' appearances before the Grand

y, and, as shown by Attachment E to the Black Affidavit, Epstein was receiving professional chiropractic services from a licensed chiropractor, Dr. Thomas Rofrano. Epstein's counsel misstates the state charges pending against his client. The state grand jury returned a three-count indictment. Each count charg

n had standing to assert these challenges, the subpoenas are not unreasonable and do not violate any act of production privilege. For these reasons, the United States asks the Court to deny the Motion to Quash and to order the prompt production of the requested items and the witnesses' appearances before the Grand

requested testimony would not incriminate either William Riley or Riley Kiraly, as evidenced by the fact that neither has moved to quash. In Couch I United States , 409 U.S. 22 (1973), the IRS issued a summons to the defendant's accountant for the defendant's receipts and other tax materials. After receiving t

y, and, as shown by Attachment E to the Black Affidavit, Epstein was receiving professional chiropractic services from a licensed chiropractor, Dr. Thomas Rofrano. Epstein's counsel also misstates the state charges pending against his client. The state grand jury returned a three-count indictment. Each count

SERVED BY TITLE STATEMENT OF SERVICE FEES TRAVEL SERVICES TOTAL DECLARATION OF SERVICE' I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United Stales of America that the foregoing information contained in the Return of Service and Statement of Service Fees is true and correct. Executed on DATE Signature o

Rule 45(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2."Fees and mileage need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United States or an officer or agency thereof (Rule 45(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 17(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure) or on behalf of cert

re transfer records 03/06/2007 OLY-31 Western Union wire transfer records 03/06/2007 OLY-32 JP Morgan Chase bank records 03/06/2007 OLY-33 Thomas Rofrano billing statements, record of payments, appointment books, treatment notes and correspondence 3/13/2007 Page -3- EFTA00178393 GRAND JURY SUB

y had been in his home and/or belonged to him, which would, in turn, at a minimum, implicitly authenticate the contents of the materials. See, e.g., United States v. Stewart, 2003 WL 23024461 at *3 (S.D.N.Y. December 29, 2003) (act of production privileged where government's claimed relevance for requiring the

n in effect until you arc granted leave to depart by the court or by an officer acting • ni behalf of the court. poem) is issued upon application 'Med States of America DATE: March 2, 2007 Name, Address and Phone Number of Assistant U.S. Attorney ssistant U.S. Attorney 500 So. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West

l records including treatment notes of Mr. Epstein's treatment by a chiropractor (see Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, dated March 13, 2007, to Dr. Thomas Rofrano annexed as Exhibit "E"), and now, invasion of the defense camp by seeking records of the investigative work performed by Mr. Riley on behalf of you

1 of 7 EXHIBIT 37 EFTA00184577 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-37 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 7 U.S. Department of Justice United Stales Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LIP Citigroup Center New York, New York 100

ustralian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 aesimt June 30, 2008 NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIMS NOTICE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 3509(d) AND FLORIDA LAW, THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT IS TO BE TREATED AS CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED EXCEPT IN CONNECTION WITH

and DUI. Requests for copies of the reports involving the arrests were reque Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office. The last number is assigned to Thomas Rofrano of 9850 Alt AlA in Palm Beach Gardens. Research on Mr. Rofrano, revealed that he is a Florida Chiropractic Physician. Vehicles that were previousl

mail chain from Jeff Sloman to Andrew Oosterbaan, Marie Villafana, and Alex Acosta regarding Epstein meeting 8/ 7/ 200- Reply of Jeffrey Epstein to United States' Response to His Motion to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Compel and Sealed Document Tracking Form 8/8/2007 Andre

iews of various witnesses taken during state's investigation. 2/27/2007 Grand Jury Testimony of E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall 1 8 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Thomas Rofrano (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena toJohanna Siola(return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to P