Epstein Secrets

176 Exhibit 1 EFTA00799629 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 26 of 176 U.S. Department of Justice United Slates Attorney Southern District of FlOrida DELIVERY BY BAND James L. Bamberg, Esq. 250 S Australian Ave, Ste104 West Palm Beach, FL 33.401-5007 Dear

uary 24, 2007 Re; Federal _Subpoena have enclosed a new subpoena forTEM MS M I mentioned earlier, Ms. Millis nova target of this investigation and the United States ec s her testimonysolely ea avictim/wituess, Daring our last conyemationregarrling Ms. NiIM you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pu

or the Southern District of Florida. I state that there have been no additional promises, agreements pt representations-made to me by any officiala ofthe United States in connection with this matter. Dated: February , 2007 'West Palm Beach, Florida witnessed by: lames la limber Attorney feel= Case No. 08-8073

Florida. I graduated from the University of California at Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall) in 1993. After serving as a judicial clerk to the Hon. David F. Levi in Sacramento, California, I was admitted to practice in California in 1995. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesot

mend Court's Order 6 Document bearing Bates No. 1112 7 Report of Interview of 8 Handwritten Notes of Special Agents and of Inten, IL' of 9 United States' Emergency Motion to Revoke Bond (DE 9) 10 United States' Response to Motion to Reinstate Bond (DE 26) 11 United States' Response to Standing Disc

ity of California at Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall) in 1993. Following graduation, I served as a judicial clerk to United States District Judge David F. Levi in Sacramento, California. After my clerkship, I worked at the law firms of Morrison & Foerster in San Francisco, California; Rosen, Bien & Asaro i

hteen months' imprisonment, to be followed by twelve months of home confinement. Finally, Epstein would have to agree that the victims identified by the United States would be entitled to damages under federal law as though Epstein had been convicted at trial. This last provision was included at the Office's insis

Florida. I graduated from the University of California at Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall) in 1993. After serving as a judicial clerk to the Hon. David F. Levi in Sacramento, California, I was admitted to practice in California in 1995. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota

so investigating allegations stemming from the February 21, 2019 order issued by U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra, in Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2 I. United States, 9:08-80736-CIV- MARRA (S.D. Fla.), in which Judge Marra concluded that the USAO violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771 (CVRA) by

tion of Jonathan Biran, a partner at Baker Donelson in Washington, DC. Mr. Biran graduated from Stanford Law School in 1993 and clerked for the Hon. David F. Levi at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. Following his clerkship, Mr. Biran was an associate in the white collar practice

As noted above, OPR is investigating the conduct of members of the USAO underlying Judge Marra's Order in the matter of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States. The Supreme Court has interpreted Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(i) broadly, that is, for uses that are "related fairly directly to some identifiable litigation,

a partner at Baker Donelson in Washington, DC, as my counsel. Mr. Biran graduated from Stanford Law School in 1993 and clerked with me for the Hon. David F. Levi at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. Following his clerkship, Mr. Biran worked with the Public Integrity Section at t

d accomplish its purposes and intent"). The CVRA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States'. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States.. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a w

Florida. I graduated from the University of California at Berkeley School of Law (BoaIt .) in 1993. After serving as a judicial clerk to the Hon. David F. Levi in Sacramento, California, I was admitted to practice in California in 1995. I also ant admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minneso

6, 1998, at BS. 22 Victims' Rights Amendment. Hearing on S.J. Res. 6 Before the S. Judiciary Comm., 105th Cong. 64 (1997) (statement of Janet Reno, U.S. Att'y Gen.). 30 See www.nveap.org (last visted Dec. 30, 2007). 3! For a comprehensive history of victims' efforts to pass a constitutional amendment,

able to reflect the new role of victims throughout the Rules. Moreover, Congress intended the CVRA to be "a formula for success" and a "model for our States." + The only way the federal rules could serve as a model, I argued, was by fully implementing victims’ rights. I then proposed twenty-eight specific

witnesses."). 441 See, e.g., United States v. Pearson, 340 F.3d 459, 468 (7th Cir. 2003); United States v. Bejasa, 904 F.2d 137, 139 (2d Cir. 1990); United States v. Barrett, 766 F.2d 609, 617 (ist Cir. 1985); United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 910 (6th Cir. 1970). 342 631 F.2d 951, 954-55 (9th Cir.

gly expects this to happen. Congress adopted the CVRA with the express goal of making the new law "a formula [*855] for success" and a "model for our States." 111 Congress clearly wants the new law aggressively implemented, thereby avoiding the need for further legislative action or even, possibly, a fede

after considering various relevant factors. 3 See Letter from Ed Carnes, Chair of the Advisory Comm. on Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to Hon. David F. Levi, Chair of the Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure (May 18, 2004) (on file with the author) (noting that proposed expansion of Rule