Epstein Secrets

belialfciftiie Piaintiff. APPEAR]NG·ON,DEHALF \)F PI.:AINTIFl'.13.8.: SPENGER T. KUYIN. ESQ, LEOPOLIFKUVIN, P,A. 2925:J'GA Bo~lcvard, Suitc.200 Palm Beach Gardens, Flon<la .3341 <i .APP,EARJNG Ol'./.1:3.EHALE OF PL,'.\INl;IFFS' JANE I>QF.<; 2~8: AQAM 1:10Jl9WJTZ,.E~Q. MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P:A. 18205.Disc

ofsaid 7 deposilion.on behalfof the Plaintiff. 8' 9 OF PLAINTIFF B.B.r 10 SPENCER T. KUVIN. ESQ. LEOPOLiKKUVIN,P.A. 11 2925.*PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida ,33410 12 13 .APPEARING ONBEHAEEOF PLAINTIFFS'JANE DOES 2-8: 14 ADAM HOROWITZ. ESQ. MERMH-STEIN & HOROWITZ, P:A. 1-5 18205iBiscayne Boulevar

e case through the NPA or in the negotiations leading to the agreement: former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, and former AUSAs Jeffrey H. Sloman, Matthew I. Menchel, Andrew C. Lourie, and Ann Marie C. Villafana. Each subject submitted written responses detailing their involvement in the federal investigation of E

ttorneys to disenfranchise and silence the victims. It is unfortunate, and appears fundamentally unfair to the victims, that Acosta and Sloman (after Menchel and Lourie departed) took the unusual step of deciding to vet the USAO victim notification letters with the defense after the NPA was signed, but fai

the experience.feeling confused and believing she had been misled. OPR did not find evidence supporting a conclusion that Villafana, Acosta, Sloman, Menchel, or Lourie opted not to consult with the victims in order to protect Epstein or shield the NPA from public scrutiny. Although neither Sloman nor Acos

01-6235 Tel: (561) 820.8711, ext 3047 EFTA00193082 • tithed States District tourt SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: Wolf Camera 3101 PGA Blvd Palm Beach Gardens, FL SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FGJ 07-103(WPB)-Tues./No. OLY-77 SUBPOENA FOR: K PERSON DOCUMENTS OR OBJECT[S] YOU ARE HEREBY COMMA

ng activities, then I would like to see a copy of its document retention policy, so I have added that to the Attachment to the Subpoena. Third, Mr. Menchel's comment to you about potential money laundering charges related only to a resolution of the case. In other words, if the sex offense case is resol

Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: A. Marie Marie Villafatia Assistant United States Attorney cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez (with enclosure) Matthew Menchel (with enclosure) EFTA00193133 United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: • Custodian of Records Riley Kiraly Commercial Ce

Facsimile: (56!) 8204777 July 10, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Ricci—Leopold, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Jeffrey Epstein/Saige Gonzalez: NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM. Dear Mr. Leopold: • By virtue of this letter, the United States

ussed above, restitution in child exploitation cases was an issue of growing concern, so I was mindful that this plea mechanism that Criminal Chief Menchel had devised with Lilly Ann Sanchez would extinguish, the victims' right to restitution. That was one of the reasons why, on July 4, 2007, I wrote to