Epstein Secrets

redacted Appendix in TIME: 1:30 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. PLACE 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D IS Support -- or Response in Opposition to Edwards' Most Pain Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Hafolo, Presiding Judge 1, Second Supplenental Motion in Limit* addressing )7 Scope of Admissible Evidence. 18 KR. SC

rols did in fact -- and this is not 21 Elva contents or the substance of these docimants. 15 privileged -- did in fact send an e-mail Indicating Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00793839 l 25 that he didn't want a spacial master, declined our I 27 These e-nalls, your Senor,

client .• II variety of cases. It wan the entire contents of It So it was obvious that whet wes to happen at Ix the e-mail server of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, 12 that point was they were to take over the 17 and it was recognized that those e- could 13 ninisteriol task es officers of the cour

redacted Appendix in TIME: 1:30 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. PLACE 205 N. Dixie Highway, Roon IOD IS Support -- or Response in Opposition to Edwards' Most Pain Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Natal., Presiding Judge I, Second Supplenental Motion in Limine addressing J7 Scope of Admissible Evidence. IS 19 KR

rols did in fact -- and this is not 21 Elva contents or the substance of these docimants. 15 privileged -- did in fact send an e-mail Indicating Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00793792 l 25 that he didn't want a spacial master, declined our I 27 These e-nalls, your Senor,

client .• II variety of cases. It wan the entire contents of It So it was obvious that whet wes to happen at Ix the e-mail server of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, 12 that point was they were to take over the 17 and it was recognized that those e- could 13 ninisteriol task es officers of the cour

OF APPEAL FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO: 4D09-2554 Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. L.T. No. 20098CF009381A (Palm Beach) RESPONDENT B.B.'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD Respondent B.B. moves to supplement the record before the Court on Petitioner Jeffrey Epstein's

, Plaintiffs submit that the Court's exercise of this discretionary power is appropriate to transfer all corporate power over the firm to Plaintiff Rosenfeldt to effect the dissolution request in Count 1, to perform au accounting of the firm's assets and liabilities, to undertake all actions necessary to u

ds and to address the ongoing affairs of the firm in an appropriate manner through the transfer of all corporate powers to Stuart A. Rosenfeldt. Mr. Rosenfeldt, as the firm's President and only other equity holder in the firm besides Mr. Rothstein, is uniquely positioned to wind down the affairs of the fir