Epstein Secrets

POLICE DEPARTMENT A NATIONAL AND STATE ACCREDITED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY May 1, 2006 PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL Mr. Barry E. Krischer, State Attorney Office of the State Attorney Fifteenth. Judicial Circuit 401 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Dear Mr. Krischer, Please find enclosed the probable cause aff

2:44 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Case 9:08-cv,80736-KA.ocurnen\ 48-5 Emered on FLSD Do.03/21/2011 I I :sentenced not later y,an October 26, 2007-. the UnitedjStates bas 110 objection to J;:pstein seJfsreporting to begin ~rving hls sentence ·not later than January 4, 2008. • 12. Epstein agrees that.he will no

lty and to ·provide compensation in the tQanner aescribed ab()ye, ifEpsteirt successfully fulfills allt>fthe tenns ~ _conditi9M of this agreement, the United Stat~s 1,1~0 agrees that it will niH institute: BilY criminal charges against any potential ~~onspirators ofEpstein, inclµding but not limited toi Sarah Ke

offense includcs; ;but is net limitadto; a conviction liy a foderabor miUtary'tribunal,-including courts-martial conducted by the Armed Forcos of tho United Status,, >and includes a conviction-orentry of a ploa of',guilty or nolo contendere resulting in a-sanctiun in anyistato of dio United-States or other juris

he gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. Ifthe United States receives a Freedom ofInformation Act request or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to Epstein

ll.· .. attempt to obstruct justice, or ... to threaten, injure, or intimidate, a prospective witness or juror." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(t)(2)(B); see also United States v. Friedman, 837 F.2d 48 (2d Cir. 1988). The Bail Reform Act lists four factors to be considered in the detention analysis: (1) the nature and circ

text of the agreement purports to bind “the Government.” See Annabi, Tl\ F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (“Defendant’s argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it

her a letter all but d himself from the case. 170 TOWN OF POLICE D ANATIONAL AND STATE ACCT PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL Mr, Barty E Krischer, St Office of the State pid wali: Fifteenth Judicial Circuit 401 North Dine Highway West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Oear Mr. Krischer, Please find enclosed the probable c; re

g Sarah Kellen le. Fittuy Ricw The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record,” the document concludes. “If the United States receives a Freedom of Information Act request or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agree- ment, it will provide notice to Epste

he quality of the evidenc: at trial. With a federal c: considerations. First, a hom it may concern: ; ; Tow Y requires that the crime be Iserved as U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida em an interstate nexus. Secoi e . : | fi m 2005 through 2009. Over the past weeks, I have read ; charge

public of Korea for Green Growth and Environment, Office of the President, Republic of Korea Chairman Chairman an

Kingdom USA USA United Kingdom France South Africa USA USA United Kingdom Denmark USA Germany USA USA Belgium Belgium USA Switzerland Germany United Kingdom United Kingdom Switzerland Italy Thailand Germany United Kingdom United Kingdom Germany USA Belgium Switzerland Germany Japan Switzer