Epstein Secrets

een presented to you have been materially inaccurate. As you may know. the principal witnesses in this case were first interviewed by Detective of the Palm Reach Police Department (the "PRPD") and other state law enforcement officers. 'these interviews (the -*witness statements") were ollen tape-recorded thus providing a verb

tified individuals, raises cause Ibr concern as to the nature of all conununications that are made to the 'victims.' You previously stated that the IJSAO's main objective with respect to the Section 2255 component of the Agreement was to -place the victims in the same position as they would have been

sented to you have been materially inaccurate. As you may know. the principal witnesses in this case were first interviewed by Detective Recarey of the Palm Reach Police Department (the "PRPIT) and other state law enlbrcement officers. These interviews (the "witness statement() were olden tape-recorded thus providing a verbati

but based on the belief that a guardian ad litem would not be appropriate lbr adults that are capable of making their own decisions. Ilowever. the IJSAO included into the Agreement that we pay Ibr the attorney representative -- when originally Ms. Villafana stated that the representative could he paid

h a grand jury subpoena, as the correspondence with their grand jury coordinator makes perfectly clear. With regard to your allegation of my filing the Palm Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit "with the court knowing that the public could access it," I do not know to what you are referring. All documents related t

utgrowth of the fact that civil settlement. as opposed to restitution. is considered in the Agreement, A. Rule of the Attorney Representative The IJSAO has improperly emphasised that the chosen Bonney representative should be able to litigate the claims of individuals, which violates the terms, and