Epstein Secrets

ul Sexual Activity with a Minor (d) counts Principal in the 1" Lewd and Lascivious Molestation (1) count From March 15, 2005, through February 2006 the Palm Reach Police Department conducted a sexual battery investigation involving Jeffrey Epstein, =I= and Sworn taped statements were taken from five victims and seventeen wit

accompany us back to the police station for further questioning. She was also to at at the conclusion of the interview she would be returned home. Beach Police Department. voluntarily came with us back to the Palm Upon our arrival at the police station, was brought to the interview room in the Detective Bureau wher

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

i.S.S. 117.10) State of Florida County of Palm Beach Officer Signature Date: 05/0 006 Page3of 22 EFTA00231454 A9 Probable Cause Affidavit Palm Beach Police Department Agency O1U0 FLO 500600 (Unknown last name) and Tony (Unknown last name) picked up and she was taken to Epstcin's house. Upon her arrival to the house she

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

ury Type 1 : Hospital ID . : Phys First Name: INFORMATION -# 9******************** EFTA00232810 Date: 7/25/06 Time: 8:47:53 Incident Report PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 6 Program: CMS301L Case No Case Number . : Street Number : City Birth Date/Age : Occupation . . : Home Phone No. : Sex Weight Be On Loo

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting