Epstein Secrets

e individuals participating in the decision. Some time in early 2006, FBI Special Agent E. approached me about an investigation being conducted b the Town of Palm Beach Police Department ("PBPD"). I do not know how or when A was first contacted about the matter. The first mentions of the investigation were just jpassing comments du

nusz Banasiak and Mucinska. Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, Mr. Banasiak was satisfied with I standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Mucinska's attorney was insistent on formal immunity, and as noted above, so was Individual #28. I don't believe that, prior to thi

ion of Jeffrey Epstein was handled by the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"). The federal investigation was initiated in 2006 at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department ("PBPD") into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein and his personal assistants had used facilities of interstate commerce to induce young girls between

et seq. I had several oral and written communications with Mr. Eisenberg asking him if Jane Doe 2 would appear under the protection of a standard Kastigar letter, but he told me that Jane Doe 2 would 2 EFTA00235272 only appear if 6001 immunity was received. For example, in my letter of January 24,

bout other girls that she brought to Epstein's house and providing telephone numbers and introductions to other victims. Despite this cooperation, the City of Palm Beach Police Department prepared a "probable cause affidavit" to charge Robson with the second-degree felony. The affidavit was never filed because the Palm Beach County S

ividuals. They are, however, similarly situated, so I have joined both requests for immunity in this memorandum. -1- EFTA00190247 proffer with a "Kastigar letter" or testifying before the grand jury with a "pocket immunity" letter. Both witnesses are represented by counsel. Miller is an openly hostile

een asked and always will exercise independent judgment to follow my client's independent will." (Id. at12.) Despite his expressed misgivings about the Palm Beach Police Department's handling of its investigation, Mr. Eisenberg stated that "[n]one of the above is directed at you personally. I want to repeat that you have always t

ee Ex. A. I had several oral and written communications with Mr. Eisenberg asking him if Jane Doe 2 would appear under the protection of a standard Kastigar letter, but he told me that Jane Doe 2 would only appear if statutory immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6001 was received. For example, in my letter

h a grand jury subpoena, as the correspondence with their grand jury coordinator makes perfectly clear. With regard to your allegation of my filing the Palm Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit "with the court knowing that the public could access it," I do not know to what you are referring. All documents related t

imony solely as a victim/witness. During our last conversation regarding Ms. =, you indicated that she was unwilling to speak with us pursuant to a Kastigar letter and that she also was unwilling to speak with the grand jury and intends to invoke the Fifth Amendment if questioned. Please confer with her

ACCREDITED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY July 24, 2006 HAND DELIVERED Dear M Via Your daughterawas the victim of a crime which has been investigated by the Palm Beach Police Department and subsequently referred for prosecution to the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office. You may be aware that Jeffrey Epstein was indicted on c

521-23. Interestingly, in that case, the government conceded that "the leaking of privileged materials to investigators would raise the specter of Kastigar-like evidentiary hearings". Id. at 517. This case presents the same specter should Mr. Epstein be indicted. The recognized importance of the attorn

is not forthcoming, and it is unlikely that the State of New York will open an investigation and charge However, it has been widely reported that the Palm Beach Police De artrnent prepared a ro able cause • ' " to charge a similar victim/recruiter in Florida, ,with a second-degree felony. name also appears in a nu

No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA EXHIBIT B-130 P-008365 EFTA00225363 has been approached by the FBI to provide information via an informal proffer with a "Kastigar letter" or testifying before t djury with a "pocket immunity" letter. is represented by counsel in New York. has never spoken to any law enforceme

ipating in the decision. Some time in early 2006, FBI Special Agent E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall approached me about an investigation being conducted by the Town of Palm Beach Police Department ("PBPD"). I do not know how or when S/A Kuyrkendall was first contacted about the matter. The first mentions of the investigation were just passing

in employees — Janusz Banasiak Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, r. anasi was satisfied with a standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Mucinska's attorney was insistent on formal immunity, and as noted above, so was Individual #28. I don't believe that, prior to thi