Epstein Secrets

ttorney's Office, including letters between the U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein's counsel, a prosecution memo and indictment, an investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, and notification of .. and.. (see 11 5, 20-30; Exs. A, C, H, I, K, 19 EFTA00808044 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XX

s. Under Florida law, there is no immunity for acts undertaken in judicial proceedings that bear no relation to those proceedings. See, e.g., Levin, Middlebrooks, Mahie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 616, 608 (1994). It is for a fact finder to determine whether Edwards' ac

ion of Jeffrey Epstein was handled by the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"). The federal investigation was initiated in 2006 at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department ("PBPD") into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein and his personal assistants had used facilities of interstate commerce to induce young girls between

orney General, approved the request. (See Ex. 10.) I then applied to the Court for an Order compelling Jane Doe 2's testimony. U.S. District Judge Middlebrooks granted the Application on April 16, 2007. (Ex. 11.) II. After receiving Judge Middlebrooks' Order, Mr. Eisenberg then asked whether Jane Doe 2 c

een asked and always will exercise independent judgment to follow my client's independent will." (Id. at12.) Despite his expressed misgivings about the Palm Beach Police Department's handling of its investigation, Mr. Eisenberg stated that "[n]one of the above is directed at you personally. I want to repeat that you have always t

ce Fisher, Assistant Attorney General. (See Ex. B.) I then applied to the Court for an Order compelling Jane Doe 2's testimony. U.S. District Judge Middlebrooks granted the application on April 16, 2007. (Ex. 6.) 12. After learning of Judge Middlebrooks' Order, Mr. Eisenberg asked whether Jane Doe 2 could