Epstein Secrets

3401 oytt. .;:ercA; Alexander Acosta United States Attorne ::1::1:::: 04.5.-IBSCfa513&2 $0.442 C 06/11/2009 Filailtd From334( EFTA00183941 NE PALM BEACH POST THURSDAY, JUNE 11.2009 Judge delays ruling on request to unseal plea deal in sex case By SUSAN SPENCER -WENDEL Palm Beach Post Staff Witter WES

have called it "unprec- edented" and "highly unusual." Goldberger said his cli- ent has not received any special treatment. sm. EFTA00183942 THE PALM BEACH POST • WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 2009 Women want sex plea deal unsealed Their attorneys will ask a judge to open Jeffrey Epsteffi's records. By SUSAN SPENCE

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Case Nos. 2006 CF 9454AMB, 2008 CF 9381 AMB PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC. d/b/a THE PALM BEACH Paws RESPONSE TO EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI THOMAS, LoCICERO & BRALOW PL Deanna K. Shullman James B. Lake 101 N.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 1

s June 11, 2009 motion (A-13). Epstein's counsel consented to that procedure. (A-18 at p. 9,11. 16 -18.) The Judge held that neither the State, nor the U.S. Government, nor Epstein had shown why the NPA ought to remain confidential and ordered the records unsealed.9 (A-16.) It is important to note that the State

t. The court has already entered an order dated June 25, 2009 on: a) Non-party,E's Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and petition for Access c) Motions to Intervene and for an order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court

3). Also on June 11, non-party ■. filed motions to intervene and for an order unsealing the records, alleging grounds similar to non-parties . and The Palm Beach Post (A-12). Judge Colbath heard M.'s, The Post's, and M's motions to unseal and Mr. Epstein's motion for confidentiality on June 25, 2009 (A-16). The c

n FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 2 of 8 Epstein's entry of guilty pleas to various state charges and an 18-month jail sentence, in exchange for which the U.S. Government apparently agreed to defer all federal prosecution — including any federal prosecution for the federal crimes committed against the victims. At a h

Submitting Office: MM b6 b7C 3/)~ UN- jo@g2>a17 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021653 (Rev. 5-8-81) (Indicate page, name of newspaper, city and state.) 1A, 4A Palm Beach Post Palm Beach, FL Date: 6/10/2009 Mount Clipping in Space Below) Title: Women want sex plea deal unsealed Classification: 31E-MM-108062 Submitting O

Critton. complained that a. video of Epstein being asked whether he had an “egg- shaped” penis became a youtube.com sensation. It first appeared on The Palm Beach Post Web site. Critton blamed attorney Spencer Kuvin for releas- ing it. Kuvin said it was “public record. The civil suits began mounting after Epstein

tance of the in delivering the enclosed letter t DOB telephone numbers € letter references the outcome of a Non-Prosecution Agreement entered into by the U.S. Government and Mr. Jeffrey Epstein. The letter provides[ | with the terms of the Agreement and contact information should she have any questions. On 24/07/06,

ant ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court on the following: a) Non-party E.W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and Petition for Access c) B.B.'s Motions to Intervene and for an Order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Mak

and jury investigation, and the agreement itself is very specific as to the grand jury investigation of Mr. Epstein. However, all is not lost for the Palm Beach Post and the intervenors, for that matter. The rule has a specific procedure that allows you to go to the district court where the grand jury is case

ealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions to seal the Co

he court has already entered an order dated June 25, 2009 on: a) Non-party, E.W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and petition for Access c) B.B's Motions to Intervene and for an order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make

n FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 2 of 8 Epstein's entry of guilty pleas to various state charges and an 18-month jail sentence, in exchange for which the U.S. Government apparently agreed to defer all federal prosecution — including any federal prosecution for the federal crimes committed against the victims. At a h

of the protective order barring them from publicly disclosing or discussing the terms of the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Government. Jeffrey Epstein has made no response to this motion. The Government, however, contends that the victims' motion should be denied because the victim

. : .. • • . • :2008r93$ICF- : JEFFREY EP FTED1 • ; 1 . . • • 04 • I 1•P•i:i • T'6 MOTIONTO R'YE E .; "IIPPPerl1/2 ON FORA a The Palm Beach Pest (the? ost, moves to i • • • ; , docuttuints go to theheirt of the disposition of this mac. :But In req gestinf that Stri p Pucillo • • • . ; •

ndant ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court on the following: a) Non-party M.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and Petition for Access M.'s Motions to Intervene and for an Order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Cour

ealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions taseal thet

RDS FILED BY BRADLEY EDWARDS, ESQ 64 MOT - MOTION Filing Date: 03-JUN-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E Disposition Amount: Docket Text: PALM BEACH POST'S MOTION TO INTERVENE AND PETITION FOR ACESS FILED BY DEANNA SHULLMAN, ESQ. EVRST EVENT RESET Filing Date: 10-JUN-2009 Filing Party: EPSTEIN, JEF

ates Attorney's Office Southern District 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 33623+6237" "" "" lid EFTA00233588 THE PALM BEACH POST • THURSDAY, JUNE 11.2009 Judge delays ruling on request to unseal plea deal in sex case By SUSAN SPENCER-WENDEL Palm Beach Post Saill Writer WEST P

s June 11, 2009 motion (A-13). Epstein's counsel consented to that procedure. (A-18 at p. 9,11. 16 -18.) The Judge held that neither the State, nor the U.S. Government, nor Epstein had shown why the NPA ought to remain confidential and ordered the records unsealed.9 (A-16.) 9 It is important to note that the Stat

each or County THIS MATTER came before the Court on the following: a) Non-party-Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and Petition for Access c) notionst r Itktecene and for an Order to Unseal Records ) d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Co

sealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions to seal the Co

1) • • Mount Clipping in Space Be owl Women want sex plea deal unsealed Their attorneys will ask a judge to open Jeffrey Epstein's records. BAolm Beach Post Waif Writer WEST PALM BEACH - When wealthy money manager Jeffrey Epstein of Palm Beach pleaded guilty last year to pro- curing teens for prostitut

tter to Ms. DOB , of Canberra, Australia; telephone numbers an . e letter references the outcome of a Non-Prosecution Agreement entered into by the U.S. Government and Mr. Jeffrey Epstein. The letter provides Ms. with the terms of the Agreement and contact information should she have any questions. On 24/07/

XMB ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court on the following: a) Non-party E.W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and Petition for Access c) B.B.'s Motions to Intervene and for an Order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Mak

sealing such documents. After hearing argument of counsel, the Court makes the following findings and rulings: 1) Neither the State of Florida nor the U.S. Government nor Mr. Epstein have presented sufficient evidence to warrant the sealing of documents currently held by the Court. 2) The Motions to seal the Co