Epstein Secrets

H; TIO I/ e li ti:: : ! ill' ; 1. ':. ': l • I ; II, • I.' I . • fi ,'. .:' i • • , . . ii I! tkillm.IEloioh NeWsiJapests, Trio., a The Palm Beach Pöst (dte! ost") moves to , i',' , , T. ; "! • i ; '.' i• . ; • • i • 4., ,. . , • 111 i intorvgain this acta for the limited ose of seeking ao4ess

ords and Unseal Records was filed by Non-Party EW on or about May 15, 2009. 3. A Motion to Intervene and Petition for Access was filed by Non-party Palm Beach Post on June 1, 2009. 4. This Court granted Non-Party E.W. and Palm Beach Post Motion to Intervene on June 10, 2009 but took no immediate action on E. W

lude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See Stale tuc rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband

The court has already entered an order dated June 25, 2009 on: a) Non-party, M.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and petition for Access c) Motions to Intervene and for an order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court

3). Also on June 11, non-party ■. filed motions to intervene and for an order unsealing the records, alleging grounds similar to non-parties . and The Palm Beach Post (A-12). Judge Colbath heard .'s, The Post's, and ■.'s motions to unseal and Mr. Epstein's motion for confidentiality on June 25, 2009 (A-16). The

granted, and the remedial quality of any such harm. See Perez v. Perez, 769 M. 2d 389, 391 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 E. 2d 1037, 1038 n.3 (Fla. 1980). The trial court agreed that Mr. Epstein had established irreparable harm (A-17:16), denied a 7 EFTA00231139

t. The court has already entered an order dated June 25, 2009 on: a) Non-party,E's Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and petition for Access c) Motions to Intervene and for an order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court

3). Also on June 11, non-party ■. filed motions to intervene and for an order unsealing the records, alleging grounds similar to non-parties . and The Palm Beach Post (A-12). Judge Colbath heard M.'s, The Post's, and M's motions to unseal and Mr. Epstein's motion for confidentiality on June 25, 2009 (A-16). The c

granted, and the remedial quality of any such harm. See Perez v. Perez, 769 So. 2d 389, 391 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So. 2d 1037, 1038 n.3 (Fla. 1980). The trial court agreed that Mr. Epstein had established irreparable harm (A-17:16), denied a 7 EFTA0023225

. : .. • • . • :2008r93$ICF- : JEFFREY EP FTED1 • ; 1 . . • • 04 • I 1•P•i:i • T'6 MOTIONTO R'YE E .; "IIPPPerl1/2 ON FORA a The Palm Beach Pest (the? ost, moves to i • • • ; , docuttuints go to theheirt of the disposition of this mac. :But In req gestinf that Stri p Pucillo • • • . ; •

ndant ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court on the following: a) Non-party M.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and Petition for Access M.'s Motions to Intervene and for an Order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Cour

clude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband

he court has already entered an order dated June 25, 2009 on: a) Non-party, E.W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and petition for Access c) B.B's Motions to Intervene and for an order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make

granted, and the remedial quality of any such harm. See Perez v. Perez, 769 So. 2d 389, 391 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So. 2d 1037, 1038 n.3 (Fla. 1980). The trial court agreed that Mr. Epstein had established irreparable harm (A-17:16), denied a 7 EFTA0018064

ndant ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court on the following: a) Non-party M.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and Petition for Access c) B.B.'s Motions to Intervene and for an Order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Mak

clude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 1.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband p