Epstein Secrets

H; TIO I/ e li ti:: : ! ill' ; 1. ':. ': l • I ; II, • I.' I . • fi ,'. .:' i • • , . . ii I! tkillm.IEloioh NeWsiJapests, Trio., a The Palm Beach Pöst (dte! ost") moves to , i',' , , T. ; "! • i ; '.' i• . ; • • i • 4., ,. . , • 111 i intorvgain this acta for the limited ose of seeking ao4ess

ords and Unseal Records was filed by Non-Party EW on or about May 15, 2009. 3. A Motion to Intervene and Petition for Access was filed by Non-party Palm Beach Post on June 1, 2009. 4. This Court granted Non-Party E.W. and Palm Beach Post Motion to Intervene on June 10, 2009 but took no immediate action on E. W

ld a stay not be 769 So.2d 389, 391 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Defendants fail to adequately ad completely ignores the likelihood likelihood that the Fourth District would reverse for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defe

. : .. • • . • :2008r93$ICF- : JEFFREY EP FTED1 • ; 1 . . • • 04 • I 1•P•i:i • T'6 MOTIONTO R'YE E .; "IIPPPerl1/2 ON FORA a The Palm Beach Pest (the? ost, moves to i • • • ; , docuttuints go to theheirt of the disposition of this mac. :But In req gestinf that Stri p Pucillo • • • . ; •

ndant ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court on the following: a) Non-party M.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and Petition for Access M.'s Motions to Intervene and for an Order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Cour

equately ad•` s fa ;•rs in their motion. In fact, Defendant completely ignores the likelihood Likely this is because there is no likelihood that the Fourth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to

ndant ORDER THIS MATTER came before the Court on the following: a) Non-party M.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and Petition for Access c) B.B.'s Motions to Intervene and for an Order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Mak

ately ad s these fa rs in their motion. In fact, Defendant completely ignores the likelihood Likely this is because there is no likelihood that the Fourth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to