11
Shared Docs
11
Same-Page
11 / 11
Mentions
d give the Court little comfort the defendant would appear in Court if released on bail. 6 In fact, the defendant's own submission makes clear that the Palm Beach Property is not his brother's exclusive residence and that his brother lives elsewhere for half of the year. EFTA00100385 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
d give the Court little comfort the defendant would appear in Court if released on bail. 6 In fact, the defendant's own submission makes clear that the Palm Beach Property is not his brother's exclusive residence and that his brother lives elsewhere for half of the year. EFTA00105483 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
d give the Court little comfort the defendant would appear in Court if released on bail. 6 In fact, the defendant's own submission makes clear that the Palm Beach Property is not his brother's exclusive residence and that his brother lives elsewhere for half of the year. EFTA00058460 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
d give the Court little comfort the defendant would appear in Court if released on bail. 6 In fact, the defendant's own submission makes clear that the Palm Beach Property is not his brother's exclusive residence and that his brother lives elsewhere for half of the year. EFTA00068055 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
d give the Court little comfort the defendant would appear in Court if released on bail. 6 In fact, the defendant's own submission makes clear that the Palm Beach Property is not his brother's exclusive residence and that his brother lives elsewhere for half of the year. EFTA00071679 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
d give the Court little comfort the defendant would appear in Court if released on bail. 6 In fact, the defendant's own submission makes clear that the Palm Beach Property is not his brother's exclusive residence and that his brother lives elsewhere for half of the year. EFTA00076308 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
d give the Court little comfort the defendant would appear in Court if released on bail. 6 In fact, the defendant's own submission makes clear that the Palm Beach Property is not his brother's exclusive residence and that his brother lives elsewhere for half of the year. EFTA00076336 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
d give the Court little comfort the defendant would appear in Court if released on bail. 6 In fact, the defendant's own submission makes clear that the Palm Beach Property is not his brother's exclusive residence and that his brother lives elsewhere for half of the year. EFTA00076364 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
d give the Court little comfort the defendant would appear in Court if released on bail. 6 In fact, the defendant's own submission makes clear that the Palm Beach Property is not his brother's exclusive residence and that his brother lives elsewhere for half of the year. EFTA00078236 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
d give the Court little comfort the defendant would appear in Court if released on bail. 6 In fact, the defendant's own submission makes clear that the Palm Beach Property is not his brother's exclusive residence and that his brother lives elsewhere for half of the year. EFTA00080491 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
Entities connected to both The Palm Beach Post and Laskow

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Palm Beach
LOCATION
United States
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
New York
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATIONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Palm Beach Police Department
ORGANIZATIONJoe Recarey
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
New York State
LOCATION