Epstein Secrets

B. CARNEY, SPECIAL MASTER BERGER SINGERMAN, by CHARLES H. LICHTMAN, ESQUIRE On behalf of Herbert Stetti

ause if the trustee believed that -- THE COURT: There's no litigation pending. MR. FARMER: That we -- Edwards and LM have not been sued -- I mean, Lichtman's been sued, Adler. People have been brought in by the trustee because they've found evidence that they believe constitutes some wrongful conduct,

nts are held by the trustee now, and so Mr. Stettin was concerned that there may be some privilege issues on those documents, and as a result, Mr. Lichtman and the attorneys came forward before this Court and requested that there be a master appointed to help resolve this issue, and ultimately, I beca

18951 2981 Monte Susie Avestan, Maids 33180 CHARLES H. uarrmAtt ESQUIRE BERGER SINUERMAN, ATTORNEYSA

n on this matter, having spoken with him 20 numerous times about numerous other matters, to 21 speak either with him or with his counsel 22 Mr. Lichtman. I did have the opportunity to speak 23 with Mr. Coffey on Friday. 24 !can, if it would assist the Coun, proffer 25 to the Court and, if necess

/90SW" to 2 MR. SCHERER: Yes, sir, your Honor. CHARLES H. LICHTMAN, ESQUIRE 3 I'm William Soberer and E

of the subpoena has been adequately 15 point We tried to work, and we've been working with 15 represented to the Court. If you peruse this, 16 Mr. Lichtman, tried to work out a protective order 16 you will see they are asking for communications 17 between the trustee and Epstein regarding the 17 with

/90SW" to 2 MR. SCHERER: Yes, sir, your Honor. CHARLES H. LICHTMAN, ESQUIRE 3 I'm William Soberer and E

of the subpoena has been adequately 15 point We tried to work, and we've been working with 15 represented to the Court. If you peruse this, 16 Mr. Lichtman, tried to work out a protective order 16 you will see they are asking for communications 17 between the trustee and Epstein regarding the 17 with

LMAN. try 2 MR. SCHERER: Yes, sir, your Honor. CHARLES H. WHOA" ESQUIRE 3 I'm William Scherer and I'm h

, your Honor, may it 4 those, et cetera, our client has already offered 4 please the Court Again, Gary Fanner on behalfof 5 to the trustee, to Mr. Lichtman, we will pay for 5 the interested party, LM, also on behalf of 6 it, whether ifs a special master or whether it's 6 Brad Edwards and I'm sorry, y

e you had any conversation or communication with Charles Lichtman regarding the subject matter of the pen

f communications on the next page purporting to have occurred November 12, 2010? A To make sure we're on the same one, that's the email from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney and Mr. Farmer. Q There are two emails: one from Mr. Lichtman to Judge Carney, and one from Judge Carney to Gary Farmer. A Yes

16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman, Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as to the Sc

2009) 11/16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman, Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as

6/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman. Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as to the S

009) 11/16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman. Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as