Epstein Secrets

om, 249 2d 891 (4th Dep't 1998) '30 People u. Brown, 7 M.3d 831 (3d Dep't 2004) 11, 18, 25, 30 Peo

ssumed by him, at least where he had, or was chargeable with, full knowledge of the facts and another will be prejudiced by his action."); see also Kilcer v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 86 A.D.3d 682, 682 (3d Dep't 2011) (observing "the litigant should be bound by the prior stance that he or she clear

scribed procedures. 26 EFTA00798146 People v. Brown, 7 A.D.3d 831, 833 (3d Dep't 2004) (rejecting Boa

's improper Level 3 SORA adjudication stands in stark contrast to the People's position at the SORA hearing itself and should not be permitted. See Kilcer v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 86 A.D.3d 682, 682 (3d Dep't 2011) ("A litigant should not be permitted to lead a tribunal to find a fact one way an

sis for scoring under SORA. See, e.g., People u. Brown, 7 M.3d 831, 832-33 (3d Dep't 2004) (overturning

3 4 EFTA00584104 SORA adjudication stands in stark contrast to the People's position at the SORA hearing itself and should not be permitted. See Kilcer v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 86 3d 682, 682 (3d Dep't 2011) ("A litigant should not be permitted to lead a tribunal to find a fact one way and