Epstein Secrets

8 United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1985) United States v. Bortnovsky, passim 820 F.2d 572 (2d Cir. 1987) 22, 23 United States v. Brown, No. 99-1230(L), 2002 WL 34244994 (2d Cir. Apr. 26, 2002) 16 United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1979) 20 United States v

District of New York with related, but distinct weapons possession offense). The Court should not apply them here. Instead, the Court should follow the Third Circuit's approach in United States v. Gebbie, 294 F.3d 540 (3nd Cir. 2002), which involved a situation like this one where the charges in the second prosecu

g trafficking offenses may properly be required to disclose the details of their personal finances as a condition of *1222 supervised release. See Brown, 402 F.3d at 137(affirming financial disclosure condition imposed on defendant convicted of drug trafficking in part because "given this particula

ll Dulien Steel Prod- ucts, 5 Cir., 1957, 40 F.2d 414 (tempo- rary restraining order i ued after notice) differs from Sims Greene, I believe that the Third Circuit's interpre- tation better follows the words and in- tent of the Rule.' Follow' g the type of relief granted in in Sims Greene, I would hold that th

umption In favor of public access to the courts. Brown I. Advantage Engineer- The doctrine of ancillary

pport Systems: Why Give Up More Than Necessary, 14 John Marshall J. of Comp. & Inf. Law 523, 551 (1996) (noting that "other courts have not accepted the Third Circuit's position" in Sporck). Even those courts which have found some basis for agreement with Sporck have rejected its broad expansion of the work product