Epstein Secrets

F.3d 371, 374-75 (11th Cir.1996); United States Brown, 53 F.3d 312, 314-15 (11th Cir.1995). us, Devers

t 756. In Hicks, we extended that reasoning to § 2423(b)'s prohibition of travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct. 457 F.3d at 841. Helder and Hicks control here, and apply with equal force to the third statute under which Spurlock was convicted: attempt to know- ingly transfer obscen

tual minor must be involved, the govern- ment proved no violation of federal law. This argument is foreclosed by our deci- sions in United States v. Helder, 452 F.3d 751 (8th Cir.2006), and United States v. Hicks, 457 FM 838 (8th Cir2006). In Heftier, we concluded that an actual minor victim is not r

2422(b); 2451(a) & (b) Not Consummated Sting Found guilty of attempt at bench trial and sentenced to 180 months & 3 year supervision. U.S. I Brown, 126 Fed. Appx. 448 (10`h Cir. 2005) Internet Internet chat room communications with "13 yr-old"; arranged to meet for sexual encounter; arreste

d no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Showed up at meeting Helder. U.S. I Helder, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Internet No information available. Court held that 2422(b) requires actual 2422(b) Sting 38874 (W.D. Mo

09 minor to engage in sex activity. 04- James Brown I [None] Use of intemet to entice 14032 mino

crime. See United States'. Root, 296 F.3d 1222, 1227-32 (j1 di Cir. 2002); United States' Sims, 428 F.3d 945, 9a9 (10th Cir. 2005); United Stalest. Helder, 452 F.3d 751 (8th Cir. 2006); United States'. Meek, 366 F.3d 705, 717-20 (9th Cir. 2004). Likewise, the Circuits have rejected void for vagueness,

ound guilty of attempt at bench trial and sentenced to 180 months & 3 year supervision. 2422(b); 2451(a) & (b) Not Consummated Sting • U.S. v. Brown, 126 Fed. Appx. 448 (10'h Cir. 2005) Internet Internet chat room communications with "13 yr-old"; arranged to meet for sexual encounter; arreste

ct. Defendant claimed no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Helder. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated • • Showed up at meeting Sting 64 EFTA01729548 egIllit 1 CASES, --- Fs ILI - -- ' enc: , , • . -CR

Found guilty of attempt at bench trial and sentenced to 180 months & 3 year supervision. 2422(b); 2451(a) & (b) Not Consummated Sting U.S. v. Brown, 126 Fed. Appx. 448 (10th Cir. 2005) Internet Internet chat room communications with "13 yr-old"; arranged to meet for sexual encounter; arreste

ct. Defendant claimed no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Helder. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated Showed up at meeting Sting 64 EFTA00079477 COURT CASES , FAC:ILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. v.

AM and ItCovered with Townsend lea:her (Ileolape Brown) THE FOLLOWING MANUALS ANDAPPROVED DATA HAVE BEE

ay' I I 1414414 Home 6 .4 SPEOAL AiRAORDI NESS CERTIPICATE Om remmesisso PROURY 9 UGNTSPORT I I Arlan I I Pommarscru. I I WilisflEtsflOATIM Helder I I 2 Ara.. UNTIED Wm Man Of I CUSS I 3 PRORSIONAL nAme• env 2 CUSS I 1 ACIRCIARITE NO PEST CORROL 2 AERIAL SURVEY 3 AERIAL ADVERTI

suit for the murder of Ronald Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson) 1996-1997 Consultant to the Office of

ates (mother charged with drowning her five children) 2002-2004 Consultant to the United States Attorney's Office, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in U.S. v. Helder (serial mailbox bombings in Nebraska, Colorado, Texas, Illinois, and Iowa) 2003 Consultant to the Office of the District Attorney, Prince Willia

g trafficking offenses may properly be required to disclose the details of their personal finances as a condition of *1222 supervised release. See Brown, 402 F.3d at 137(affirming financial disclosure condition imposed on defendant convicted of drug trafficking in part because "given this particula

) engaged in conduct that constitutes a substantial step towa commission of the crime. See United States Farner. 251 F.3d 510, 513 (5th Cir.2001); Helder, 452 F.3d at 755. Whether Defendant had the requisite culpability for the underlying offense can be addressed by inquiring whether Defendant inte

or to engage in sex activity. 04- 14032 James Brown I [None] Use of intemet to entice minor to en

ime. See United States v. Root, 296 F.3d 1222, 1227-32 (11th Cir. 2002); United States v. Sims, 428 F.3d 945, 959 (10th Cir. 2005); United States x Helder, 452 F.3d 751 (8th Cir. 2006); United States v. Meek, 366 F.3d 705, 717-20 (9th Cir. 2004). Likewise, the Circuits have rejected void for vagueness,

Found guilty of attempt at bench trial and sentenced to 180 months & 3 year supervision. 2422(b); 2451(a) & (b) Not Consummated Sting U.S. I Brown, 126 Fed. Appx. 448 (10th Cir. 2005) Internet Internet chat room communications with "13 yr-old"; arranged to meet for sexual encounter; arreste

no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor, court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Showed up at meeting Helder. U.S. I Helder. Internet No information available. 2422(b) 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Sting Court held that 2422(b) requires actual 38874 (W.D. Mo