Epstein Secrets

arge for failing to turn over to police, and subsequently trying to sell a journal in which he had recorded Epstein's activities. FBI Special Agent Christina Pryor reviewed the material and agreed it was information "that would have been extremely useful in investigating and prosecuting the case, including name

ial witnesses and additional victims "(1261121 Civil cases Jane Does v. Epstein (2008) On February 6, 2008, an anonymous Virginia woman, known as Jane Doe No. 2, filed a $50-million civil lawsuit 12S in federal court against Epstein, saying that when she was a 16- year-old minor in 2OO4-O5, she was "r

arge for failing to turn over to police, and subsequently trying to sell a journal in which he had recorded Epstein's activities. FBI Special Agent Christina Pryor reviewed the material and agreed it was information "that would have been extremely useful in investigating and prosecuting the case, including name

victims (23°) Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) A December 30, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe ( and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department of Justice's N and his limited 2008 state plea. Th

t his former employ- er was having sex with underage girls, and of viewing underage por- nography on computers in Epstein’s home. - ; * Special Agent Christina Pryor wrote that later review of the papers and book Rodriguez handed over revealed information “that would have been extremely useful in investigating and

ansion as a teen and sexually abused. Prominent Miami at- torney Robert Josefsberg filed the most recent federal lawsuit last week, on behalf of the Jane Doe ‘ 101 who allegedly visited Epstein a few times while 17 years old and was paid $200 at least once for her time there, according to the complaint.

his former employ- er ens having sex with underage girls, and of viewing underage poi, nography on computers in Epsteink borne. • • Special Agent Christina Pryor wrote that later review of the payers and book Rodriguez handed over revealed information "that would have been extremely useful in investigatin

• COLLEGE OF LAW March 1, 2011 Wifredo A. Ferrer United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N.E.4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Re: Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 vs. United States, No. 09-80736 Dear Mr. Ferrer: We are writing to you personally on behalf of Jane Doe #1. and Jane Doe #2 in o

e. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010532 --- PAGE BREAK --- James PATTERSON In the meantime, Epstein began to settle out of court with his victims. In Februar Jane Doe #2 brought a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein. At the time of their meeting, she claimed, Epstein was fifty-two years old. She was a tee

had over to the authorities. By | demanding money for the information, Rodriguez was commit: = ting another crime. According to a sworn statement by Christina Pryor, a special | agent with the FBI, Rodriguez “persisted that he would only turty over the information in his possession in exchange for $50,000." 218

her back atis y- fabulous world that he Brooklyn boy knew not taught Epstein the differ But despite—or was il Epstein, she, too, gradi According to Jane Doe : | filed in 2009 by a womart Ly of the services Maxwell ment of underage wom papers, Maxwell has ve Virginia, with any othe with, or with any crim

had over to the authorities. By a demanding money for the information, Rodriguez was commit 4 ting another crime. According to a sworn statement by Christina Pryor, a special | agent with the FBI, Rodriguez “persisted that he would only turn 0,000" over the information in his possession in exchange for $5 218