Epstein Secrets

6, 9 N.Y. Penal Law § 230.25 9 Rules Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 3-205 (Farrell 11th ed.) 19 Sex O

ppropriate where the apparent impartiality of the lower court has been legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding resentencing matter to a different Justice where the "appearance of fairness and impartiality [was]

6, 9 N.Y. Penal Law § 230.25 9 Rules Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 3-205 (Farrell 11th ed.) 19 Sex O

ppropriate where the apparent impartiality of the lower court has been legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding resentencing matter to a different Justice where the "appearance of fairness and impartiality [was]

6, 9 N.Y. Penal Law § 230.25 9 Rules Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 3-205 (Farrell 11th ed.) 19 Sex O

ppropriate where the apparent impartiality of the lower court has been legitimately questioned, as it most certainly has here. See, e.g., People v. Rampino, 55 A.D.3d 348, 349 (1st Dep't 2008) (remanding resentencing matter to a different Justice where the "appearance of fairness and impartiality [was]