Epstein Secrets

On 19 Aug 2020, at 18:19 wrote: External email: is it safe to open attachments and links? Received, thank you. We'll speak with you then. T Cc: Richardson a; Daniel Cundy Subject: Re: Reference materials further to our call Yes Same dial in details as before. Regards EFTA00104839 Gary Bloxsome I

e A7-327) to the limitations and protections on use when their compulsory powers are used in MLAT requests, an approach which reflects such cases as Kastigar it. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972) as well as decisions in UK domestic law. We reiterate the protection at Article 7 (2) of the MLAT treaty alth

e of plea, but that date had not yet been set by state authorities at the time the first victims were notified. 33. Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richards met with three victims, including Jane Doe 1, soon after the NPA was signed. It had been anticipated that they would meet with all the victims. How

ee Ex. A. I had several oral and written communications with Mr. Eisenberg asking him if Jane Doe 2 would appear under the protection of a standard Kastigar letter, but he told me that Jane Doe 2 would only appear if statutory immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6001 was received. For example, in my letter

basis for finding a suspect class. Frontier* v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, 686, 93 S.Ct. 1764, 1770, 36 L.Ed

itness' invocation of the Fifth Amendment, the Supreme Court has held that the scope of the immu- nity granted must be as broad as the privi- lege. Kastigar, 406 U.S. at 460, 92 S.Ct. at 1859. Due to the cumbersome requirements of obtaining properly authorized statutory im- munity, U.S. Attorneys often

Epstein, Leslie, Ciceila and ---- Original Message From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)<[email protected]> To: Kuyrkendall, E N.; Richards, Jason R. Sent: Fri Jun 06 14:40:06 2008 Subject: Call from M's attorney a attorney called and she would really like full immunity. I said no, so

No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA EXHIBIT B-130 P-008365 EFTA00225363 has been approached by the FBI to provide information via an informal proffer with a "Kastigar letter" or testifying before t djury with a "pocket immunity" letter. is represented by counsel in New York. has never spoken to any law enforceme

I 't a irseript of #37 Testimony 23 5/8/2007 Presentation Materials 24 5/8/2007 Transcript of Kuyrkendall Testimony 25 5/8/2007 Transcript of Richards Testimony 26 5/14/07- 5/21/07 Emats between Andrew Laurie, Mau MencheLjeff Sloman, mid Marie Villakula 27 5/15/2007 Transcript of Kuyrkendall Te

in employees — Janusz Banasiak Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, r. anasi was satisfied with a standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Mucinska's attorney was insistent on formal immunity, and as noted above, so was Individual #28. I don't believe that, prior to thi