Epstein Secrets

pstein" (191 65; see also 62-67); Edwards' rationalization as to why he noticed Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Donald Trump, David Copperfield and Bill Richardson for deposition en 70-75); purported relevancy of pilot and flight logs to show interstate airplane travel in support of Jane Doe's Federal Rico clai

Third, evidence of a settlement or statements made during settlement negotiations are inadmissible to prove liability under §90.410, Fla. Stat. See Richardson v. State, 706 So. 2d 1349, 1355-1356 (Fla. 1998) ("Rule 3.172(h) and Section 90.410, Florida Statutes (1991), prohibit the admission of statements

er proper person attesting to their authenticity or correctness. . . . They were received without any foundation other than the representations of Appellees counsel. In short, rule 1.510(e), by its very language, excludes any document from the record on a motion for summary judgment that is not one of t

process attempted under section 48.031(2)(b), Florida Statutes is void as a matter of law. See generally Demir, 2018 WL 6186233, at *2; Stettner v. Richardson, 143 So. 3d 987 (Fla. 3d 'For example, section 48.161, Florida Statutes governs substituted service of process on a nonresident or a person who con

r Authorities iii EFTA00808438 PREFACE Appellant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, was the Defendant below and will be referred to in this brief as "Epstein." Appellees, JEAN-LUC BRUNEL, individually, and MC2 MODEL & TALENT MIAMI, LLC, were the Plaintiffs below and will be referred to in this brief as "Plaintiffs"

basis for finding a suspect class. Frontier* v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, 686, 93 S.Ct. 1764, 1770, 36 L.Ed

Adam Augustine Caner, Law Office of Adam A. Carter, Washington, DC, for Appellant. Neil Matthew Corwin, U.S. Attorney's Office, New York, NY, for Appellees. Before: and ROGERS, Circuit Judges, SIIIMnior Circuit Judge. JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. "1 This case was considered on the record from O 2007 Thom