Epstein Secrets

os. MISC-J-86.183-14, MISC-J-86-183- 4, Susan H. Black, J., which denied motions to suppress subpoenas.

W.D.N.Y.1974), are particularly relevant to the case at hand. Both cases involved federal grand jury subpoenas issued to officials of the New York State Department of Taxation for the production of certain tax records. The petitioners moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that compliance would be in violation of ce

os. MISC-J-86-183-14, MISC-J-86.183. 4, Susan H. Black, J., which denied motions to suppress subpoenas.

W.D.N.Y.1974), are particularly relevant to the case at hand. Both cases involved federal grand jury subpoenas issued to officials of the New York State Department of Taxation for the production of certain tax records. The petitioners moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that compliance would be in violation of ce

os. MISC-J-86-183-14, MISC-J-86.183- 4, Susan H. Black, J., which denied motions to suppress subpoenas.

W.D.N.Y.1974). are particularly relevant to the ease at band. Both cases involved federal grand jury subpoenas issued to officials of the New York State Department of Taxation for the production of certain tax records. The petitioners moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that compliance would be in violation of ce

os. MISC-J-86-183-14, MISC-J-86-183- 4, Susan H. Black, J., which denied motions to suppress subpoenas.

W.D.N.Y.1974), are particularly relevant to the case at hand. Both cases involved federal grand jury subpoenas issued to officials of the New York State Department of Taxation for the production of certain tax records. The petitioners moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that compliance would be in violation of ce

os. MISC-J-86-183-14, MISC-1.86.183- 4, Susan H. Black, J., which denied motions to suppress subpoenas.

W.D.N.Y.I974), are particularly relevant to the case at hand. Both cases involved federal grand jury subpoenas issued to officials of the New York State Department of Taxation for the production of certain tax records. The petitioners moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that compliance would be in violation of ce