Document Mentions (7 shared documents)

EFTA00176507

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

Alan Dershowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00176530 • C.) c EFTA00176531 S

Court meant what it said in five years later, in United States' Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000), the Court struck down the civil remedy provision of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, ruling that it, too, was beyond Congress's Commerce Clause powers. Once again, the majority expressed concern that "Congress might use the

EFTA00190116

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ald B. Lefcourt cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. Alan I )ershowit/ EFTA00190138

meant what it said in Lopez, five years later, in United States Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000), the Court struck down the civil remedy provision of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, ruling that it, too, was beyond Congress's Commerce Clause powers. Once again, the majority expressed concern that "Congress might use the

EFTA00191396

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

st convenience. cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. Very truly yours, Goudf? Gerald B. Lefco

meant what it said in M , five years later, in United Stalest Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000), the Court struck down the civil remedy provision of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, ruling that it, too, was beyond Congress's Commerce Clause powers. Once again, the majority expressed concern that "Congress might use the

Sponsored

EFTA00184224_email_014

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

of narrowing the focus at our meeting. cc: Roy Black, Esq. Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. y y UT Gerald B.

meant what it said in Lopez, five years later, in United Stalest Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000), the Court struck down the civil remedy provision of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, ruling that it, too, was beyond :Congress's Commerce Clause powers. Once again, the majority expressed concern that ..Congress might use t

EFTA01660165

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ald B. Lefcourt cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. Alan I )ershowit, EFTA01660187

ant what it said in Lopez, five years later, in United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000), the Court struck down the civil remedy provision of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, ruling that it, too, was beyond Congress's Commerce Clause powers. Once again, the majority expressed concern that "Congress might use the

EFTA00284175

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

Alan Dershowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00284197 Tab A EFTA00284198 STEVE

Sponsored

EFTA00226396_email_012_sub_001 - EFTA00226396_439

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

Alan Dcrshowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00226777 STEVEN PINKER Johnstone Fa

ourt meant what it said in five years later, in United States v Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000), the Court strucR down the civil remedy provision of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, ruling that it, too, was beyond Congress's Commerce Clause powers. Once again, the majority expressed concern that "Congress might use the

Sponsored