Epstein Secrets

existing judicial proceeding. See, e.g., Motion, Black's Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014) ("Frequently, i

v. Beck's Est., 129 F.2d 243, 245 (2d Cir. 1942))). Where, as here, the language Congress used is clear and unambiguous, our inquiry is complete. CBS Inc. it PrimeTime 24 Joint Venture, 245 F.3d 1217, 1222 (11th Cir. 2001). We are bound to "presume that Congress said what it meant and meant what it s

commonly defined as "a noncriminal litigation." Black's Law Dictionary 34 (9th ed. 2009) (emphasis add

hile a claimant is "beyond the seas," as in 28 U.S.C. 2401(a), a court lacks the power to narrow the scope of the plain meaning of that phrase. See CBS Inc. I PrimeTime 24 Joint Venture, 245 F.3d 1217, 1228 (11th Cir. 2001) (cautioning against allowing "clearly expressed legislative decisions... [to] be

Roe In. Scrorler Ail 0561 141A (I 391f11 0 162 Black Lunt:1423) 0161 DIWODIWW 1405(g)) 3 564 *SID Th

ture said what it means and means what it said, and not add language or give some absurd or strained interpretation. As stated in 2 EFTA00233491 CBS Inc. supra at 1228 — "Those who ask courts to give effect to perceived legislative intent by interpreting statutory language contrary to its plain and un