Epstein Secrets

"[o]ne by or against whom a lawsuit is brought." Black's Law Dictionary 1154 (8th ed.2004). An individu

the circumstances in Krane "support application of the Perlman doctrine because, without the ability to raise the issue in an interlocutory appeal, Quellos, as a non-party, would have lost its opportunity to do so in the future." hi. at 239. The same is true here. The Court found no appellate jurisdict

NITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee ROY BLACK ET AL., Intervenor/Appellants INTERVENORS' RESP

the circumstances in Krane "support application of the Perlman doctrine because, without the ability to raise the issue in an interlocutory appeal, Quellos, as a non-party, would have lost its 10 EFTA00209479 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 07/12/2013 Page: 16 of 25 opportunity to do so in the future."

NITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee ROY BLACK ET AL., Intervenor/Appellants INTERVENORS' RESP

the circumstances in Krane "support application of the Perlman doctrine because, without the ability to raise the issue in an interlocutory appeal, Quellos, as a non-party, would have lost its 10 EFTA00209548 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 07/12/2013 Page: 16 of 25 opportunity to do so in the future."

NITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee ROY BLACK ET AL., Intervenors/Appellants ON APPEAL FROM A

the circumstances in Krane "support application of the Perlman doctrine because, without the ability to raise the issue in an interlocutory appeal, Quellos, as a non-party, would have lost its opportunity to do so in the future." Id. at 239. The same is true here. The Court found no appellate jurisdict

his criminal defense attorneys — appellants Roy Black and Martin Weinberg — filed motions to intervene

the circumstances in Krane "support application of the Perlman doctrine because, without the ability to raise the issue in an interlocutory appeal, Quellos, as a non- party, would have lost its opportunity to do so in the future." Id. at 239. The same is true here. The Court found no appellate jurisdict

his criminal defense attorneys — appellants Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz — filed motio

the circumstances in Krane "support application of the Perlman doctrine because, without the ability to raise the issue in an interlocutory appeal, Quellos, as a non- party, would have lost its opportunity to do so in the future." Id. at 239. The same is true here. The Court found no appellate jurisdict

Boronia Diversified Fund (AIP) $390,113 Double Black Diamond Class C (AIP) $1,263,073 GEM Realty Sec

ents and special purpose fund investments primarily with the 1996 Trust, MBZ 1983 Family Trust, general partners and investment managers underlying Quellos absolute return and private capital funds of funds. MBZ Crut MorganStanley SmithBarney 146 EFTA00283598 Mortimer B. Zuckerman and Related Enti