Epstein Secrets

Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stump

n letter to me. This was the first written communication I had received from the FBI. The letter was attached as Exhibit 1 to my earlier statement." D.E. 310- 1, 1 34. Exhibit 1 to her earlier statement of January 19, 2015 (D.E. 291-1), is the notification letter from the United States Attorney's Offi

on June 30, 2008, in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County to various similar state offenses including solicitation of minors for prostitution." D.E. 1,1 2. Once they received the non-prosecution Jane Doe No. 3, who seeks to be added as a party, also wasted little time in utilizing the non- prosec

replace the loss caused by the wrong or injury." Black's Law Dictionary (6th Ed.1991). "Actual damages,"

retrial motions by the parties is March 5, 2010. This action is currently set for trial on the two week calendar commencing Monday, July 16, 2010. [D.E. 119]. Thus, in order to comply with the Court's order, Defendant is filing the subject motion now. As stated above, Defendant requests and reserves

Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stump

n letter to me. This was the first written communication I had received from the FBI. The letter was attached as Exhibit 1 to my earlier statement." D.E. 310- 1, ¶ 34. Exhibit 1 to her earlier statement of January 19, 2015 (D.E. 291-1), is the notification letter from the United States Attorney's Offi

Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek E-mail: [email protected] jne

FBI's investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. She told S/A Slater that she did not want to be bothered about the Epstein matter again. D.E. 304-1, ¶ 7 and D.E. 290-3 at 17-18. In their motion, petitioners claim that the facts surrounding this exchange are highly disputed, when they are not. D.E. 311 at 16

Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black Jackie Perczek Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stum

ates: I. PETITIONERS' MOTION TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL PARTIES SHOULD BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY This action was commenced by Jane Doe #1 on July 7, 2008 (D.E. I). The Court ordered the Government to file a response by July 9, 2008, which was done. On July 11, 2008, the Court held a hearing on the emergenc

or Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boul

fficials for 8:30 a.m., Monday, June 30, 2008, AUSA Villafafia and the Palm Beach Police Department attempted to provide notice to all the victims. D.E. 14,1 11; Ex. S 1 38. AUSA Villafafia specifically called and informed Brad Edwards, the attorney who at that time was representing both Jane Doe No.

or Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boul

ined that, after the NPA was signed in September 2007, four victims were contacted and the provision for a federal restitution remedy was discussed. D.E. 14,1 8. When Epstein's attorneys learned of this, they complained that the Government was incentivizing the victims to overstate their involvement

or Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 Jacqueline Perczek BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF 201 S. Biscayne Boul

ined that, after the NPA was signed in September 2007, four victims were contacted and the provision for a federal restitution remedy was discussed. D.E. 14,1 8. When Epstein's attorneys learned of this, they complained that the Government was incentivizing the victims to overstate their involvement

the victims were not released to Mr. Epstein prior to signing the Agreement. You never asked for such a .term. During an earlier meeting, where Mr. Black was present, he raised the concern that you now voice. Mr. Black and I did not have a chance to discuss the issue, but 1 had already conceived of a

the person whom Petitioners refer to as "Jane Doe 5" also had been approached by the investigative team in 2007 but refused to speak with them. (See D.E. 14 at 1 3.) Regardless of the perceived strength of the corroborating evidence, it was and remains my professional opinion as an experienced prosec

820-8777 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: ann.marie.c,[email protected] Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 JIBlackaroyblack.com Attorneys for Proposed Intervenor

vilege log with its objections annotated (D.E. 224-1); (2) a motion to compel production of documents that are not privileged, numbering eight pages D.E. 225; (3) a twenty-four page, single-spaced affidavit of petitioners' counsel, addressing the EFTA00179785 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 230 Ent