Epstein Secrets

endant. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING OF INTERVENORS ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ IN SUPPORT O

vance of the law. Id. at 524. Judge Vinson agreed with Reichhold that the privilege was necessary to protect an organization or individual from the Hobson's choice of either undertaking an aggressive investigation and correcting dangerous conditions, "thereby creating a self-incriminating record that m

ll the arguments advanced by proposed intervenors Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz in their motion to inte

vance of the law. Id. at 524. Judge Vinson agreed with Reichhold that the privilege was necessary to protect an organization or individual from the Hobson's choice of either undertaking an aggressive investigation and correcting dangerous conditions, "thereby creating a self-incriminating record that

l the arguments advanced by proposed intervenors Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz in their motion to inte

w. EFTA00301919 Id. at 524. Judge Vinson agreed with Reichhold that the privilege was necessary to protect an organization or individual from the Hobson's choice of either undertaking an aggressive investigation and correcting dangerous conditions, thereby creating a self-incriminating record that

l the arguments advanced by proposed intervenors Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz in their motion to inter

vance of the law. Id. at 524. Judge Vinson agreed with Reichhold that the privilege was necessary to protect an organization or individual from the Hobson's choice of either undertaking an aggressive investigation and correcting dangerous conditions, "thereby creating a self-incriminating record that

: Form. And move to strike. THE WITNESS: Mr. Roy Black. BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. Okay. Who else? A. Mr. Mar

Fifth Amendment privilege has an honest explanation that would defeat civil liability (while simultaneously incriminating him), he is faced with a Hobson's choice; meaning he can suffer the risk of an adverse inference or, alternatively, he can provide sworn testimony that may be used against him at a

their opposition to the intervention of attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz that Mr. Epstein "is th

vance of the law. Id. at 524. Judge Vinson agreed with Reichhold that the privilege was necessary to protect an organization or individual from the Hobson's choice °feistier undertaking an aggressive investigation and correcting dangerous conditions, "thereby creating a self-incriminating record that m

sing the CM/ECF system. Respectfully submitted, BLACK, SREBNICK, KORNSPAN & STUMPF, P.A. 201 South Bi

vance of the law. Id. at 524. Judge Vinson agreed with Reichhold that the privilege was necessary to protect an organization or individual from the Hobson's choice of either undertaking an aggressive investigation and correcting dangerous conditions, "thereby creating a self-incriminating record that m