Epstein Secrets

he government's response [DE 74]; intervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz's opposition

asserted right of access against the other party's interest in keeping the information confidential." Romero at 1246, citing Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1309 (11' Cir. 2001). In balancing the competing interests, the court appropriately considers "whether allowing access would impair

, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, ROY BLACK, et al., Intervenors. INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR A

e of discovery" Looney v. Moore, No. 2:13-CV-00733-KOB (N.D. Ala. April 7, 2014), 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48349, at *3, citing Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1316 (11t' Cir. 2001) ("Discovery, whether civil or criminal, is essentially a private process because the litigants and the courts

' Martin G. Weinberg cc: Assistant U.S. Attorney y's Office 500 South Australian Ave Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Roy Black, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, Florida 33131 7 EFTA00621915

, 180 (1st Cir. 2003)(Both the constitutional and the common law rights of access have applied only to judicial documents"); Chicago tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1311 (11th Cir. 2001) ("when applying the common law right of access federal courts traditionally distinguish between those items w

ORDER grantin8/2i Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to supplemental briefing in support o£54, MOTION to Intervene of ii ?o, [11 ,Black,Mar i fisiaLi ejkowitz. Responsesdueby1011 011 0/2 . Signed by Judge on 9/28/2011. (ir) (Entered: 09282011) 09/29/2011 .121 Unopposed MOTION for

the asserted right of access against the other party's interest in keeping the information confidentiarRomero at 1246, citing Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1309 (11* Cir. 2001). In balancing the competing interests, the court appropriately considers "whether allowing access would impair

, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, ROY BLACK, et al., Intervenors. / INTERVENORS' MOTION FO

ture of discovery" Looney I Moore, No. 2:13-CV-00733-KOB (N.D. Ala. April 7, 2014), 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48349, at *3, citing Chicago Tribune Co. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1316 (11'1' Cir. 2001) ("Discovery, whether civil or criminal, is essentially a private process because the litigants and the court