t the other person’s interest in seeking the discovery.” Harrison v. Burlage, 2009 WL 2230794 at 4 (S.D. Fla. 2009) (citing Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. 7. Plaintiffs great concern is that through leading questions Defendant’s counsel will inform Jane Doe No. 4’s parents about the abortions. Epstei

st the other person’s interest in seeking the discovery.” Harrison v. Burlage, 2009 WL 2230794 * 4 (S.D. Fla. 2009) (citing Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2001)). 9. The persons sought to be deposed would not have information probative of Jane Doe No. 4’s claims or Defend

the asserted right of access against the other party's interest in keeping the information confidentiarRomero at 1246, citing Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1309 (11* Cir. 2001). In balancing the competing interests, the court appropriately considers "whether allowing access would impair

asserted right of access against the other party's interest in keeping the information confidential." Romero at 1246, citing Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1309 (11' Cir. 2001). In balancing the competing interests, the court appropriately considers "whether allowing access would impair

e of discovery" Looney v. Moore, No. 2:13-CV-00733-KOB (N.D. Ala. April 7, 2014), 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48349, at *3, citing Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1316 (11t' Cir. 2001) ("Discovery, whether civil or criminal, is essentially a private process because the litigants and the courts

apply the correct legal standard and follow the proper procedures in determining whether a protective order should issue. See Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. 263 F.3d 1304, 1309 (I I th Cir. 2001). A. Legal Standard Intervenor Epstein argues that the proper legal standard is the "good cause" standard

, 180 (1st Cir. 2003)(Both the constitutional and the common law rights of access have applied only to judicial documents"); Chicago tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1311 (11th Cir. 2001) ("when applying the common law right of access federal courts traditionally distinguish between those items w

apply the correct legal standard and follow the proper procedures in determining whether a protective order should issue. See Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. 263 F.3d 1304, 1309 (I I th Cir. 2001). A. Legal Standard Intervenor Epstein argues that the proper legal standard is the "good cause" standard

ture of discovery" Looney I Moore, No. 2:13-CV-00733-KOB (N.D. Ala. April 7, 2014), 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48349, at *3, citing Chicago Tribune Co. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1316 (11'1' Cir. 2001) ("Discovery, whether civil or criminal, is essentially a private process because the litigants and the court