t the other person’s interest in seeking the discovery.” Harrison v. Burlage, 2009 WL 2230794 at 4 (S.D. Fla. 2009) (citing Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. 7. Plaintiffs great concern is that through leading questions Defendant’s counsel will inform Jane Doe No. 4’s parents about the abortions. Epstei

st the other person’s interest in seeking the discovery.” Harrison v. Burlage, 2009 WL 2230794 * 4 (S.D. Fla. 2009) (citing Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2001)). 9. The persons sought to be deposed would not have information probative of Jane Doe No. 4’s claims or Defend