Epstein Secrets

mansion in New York City and on his private Caribbean island, Little Saint James. The suit was settled in 2018 under undisclosed terms.!-1§W9K141 Bradley Edwards' defamation v. Epstein (2018) A state civil lawsuit in Florida filed by attorney Bradley Edwards against Epstein was scheduled for trial in December

st opportunity to make their accusations in public. However, the case was settled on the first day of the trial, with Epstein publicly apolo • to Edwards; other terms of the settlement were confidential-14.171W- Epstein was accused of sex trafficking of minors at his mansion at.? Pat Tie streiA- V.

rtin Hamilton-Smith and Marshall declared a leadership spill against Redmond and Williams.18)194 In a partyroom ballot occurred on 23 October 2012, Redmond retained the leadership by one vote; however, Marshall was elected to the deputy leadershipisincilinIMarshall was denied his preferred treasury port

EFTA00262299 LI ZUIZZ. itaa MNt V Pau., vi imps. •••• • • • week before the 2010 election for not being Willing to publicly refuse challenging Redmond for the leadership and faced accusations, particularly by Hamilton-Smith, of derailing the Liberal campaign, with "Chapman Could Challenge" posters

tfolios, while retaining his roles in industry and trade, defence, small business and science.041 Leader of the Opposition On 31 January 2013 after Redmond resigned as Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the SA Lib it was speculated that Marshall would succeed her*t the ballot on 4 Februa arshal wa

The Palm Beach Post's (the "Post") Motion to Intervene and Petition for Access to certain court records in this case. It is our understanding that Bradley Edwards and William Berger of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler have filed a similar motion on behalf of a non-party known as =11 and that a motion is set for he

• •••••••• ••••••••••••••• • To: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. Fax: Judith Stevenson Arco, Esq. Michael McAuliffe, Esq, Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Brad ley J. Edwards, Esq. William J. Berger, Esq. From: Deanna K. Shullman, Esq. Date: 06/01/2009 Re: State v. J. Epstein Pages: 6 Urgent U For review U I Pl

el for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 80811 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las O

hael McAuliffe, Esq. Jack Alan Coldberger, Esq. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. William J. Berger, Esq. From: »minne K. Shullm

t-Child Center, Inc. and Dr. Serge Thys are protected by the psychotherapist-patient privilege pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in Jaffee'. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923 3 EFTA00182846 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 114 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/05/2009 Page 4 of 8 a k. vs. Epstein

eries13 that specifically targeted news articles from the case that addressed the defaming statements (e.g., Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley 2 Edwards lawsuit) to retrieve a set of articles that directly related to the defaming statements". I employed a modified snowball technique1s, starting with

N 1. I have been retained by the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA. to provide expert analysis and opinion on behalf of Mr. Bradley J. Edwards in the case originally styled Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff, vs. Scott Rothstein, individually, Mr. Bradley J. Edwards, individually, and'. M., indivi

ion, I have been asked to respond to the following question: 9. What is the level of dissemination of defaming statements associating Mr. Bradley J Edwards with the illegal activities of Mr. Scott Rothstein as a result of Mr. Jef•ey Epstein's lawsuit against Mr. Edwards? 3 EFTA00601579 10. For brev

en, B.J. (2008). Viewing Searching Systems as Learning Systems. Second Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval. 23 October. Redmond, Washington. Murphy, J., Canhoto, A., Hofacker, C., Hunter, I., Jansen, B.J., and Voorhees, C. (2008) The Google Online Marketing Challenge: A Glo

emands at his mansion in New York City and on his private Caribbean island, Iittl! Saint James. The suit was settled in 2018 under undisclosed te- Bradley Edwards' defamation v. Epstein (2018) A state civil lawsuit in Florida filed by attorney Bradley Edwards against Epstein was scheduled for trial in December

opportunity to make their accusations in public. However, the case was settled on the first day of the trial, with Epstein publicly apologiLing to Edwards; other terms of the settlement were confidential.W7-0§31 eta Epstein was accused of sex trafficking of minors at his mansion at ?1st Street.

rtin Hamilton-Smith and Marshall declared a leadership spill against Redmond and Williams.181191 In a partyroom ballot occurred on 23 October 2012, Redmond retained the leadership by one vote; however, Marshall was elected to the deputy leadership.lsE701f11J Marshall was denied his preferred treasury po

folios, while retaining his roles in industry and trade, defence, small business and science.(141 Leader of the Opposition On 31 January 2013 after Redmond resigned as Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the SA Liberals, it was speculated that Marshall would succeed herikt the ballot on 4 February 20

. . Mr. Epstein, in a sense, would then be adversely affected by my actions when he acted in reliance upon the agreement. How does that work? MR. EDWARDS: Certainly, we are only asking you to vacate the agreement. I understand and your point is well taken. And I believe that at that point in time his

g the course of a mediation. Our decision whether to apply this mediation privilege .. . is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 501 [and] Jaffee'. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1 (1996) . . . Recognizing that only those documents prepared for purposes of the confidential mediation are protected by the mediation pr

ONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the M

ted in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee' Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

ONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the M

ted in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee' Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

ONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the M

d in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

ONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the M

ed in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee'. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

ustler Magazine, Inc., 800 F.2d 298, 303 (2d Cir. 1986)... ce eeeeeesesseeseeeseeeeeees 13 ill HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011466 --- PAGE BREAK --- Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923, 135 L.Ed.2d 337 (1996) oe ceeeescesseeeseerseeesees 22 Kadant Johnson Inc. v. D’Amico, No. CIV.A. 10-2869, 2012 WL 2190

et BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP Salt Lake City, UT 84112 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 1200 P| Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 J. Stanley Pottinger Bradley J. Edwards 49 Twin Lakes Rd. FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, — South Salem, NY 10590 FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Po 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. — FL 33301