Epstein Secrets

to Amended to Assert Punitive Damages; Exhibit “E” — Transcript of Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein dated January 25, 2012; Exhibit “F’ — Deposition of Bradley Edwards dated March 23, 2010; Exhibit “G” - Deposition of Scott Rothstein dated June 14, 2012; Exhibit “H” — Order of HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013305 --- PAGE BREAK

ample upon the rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting.” Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. App. 1993). 2 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013320 --- PAGE BREAK --- using a vibrator and he also paid her $200 for each other under

dwards Affidavit”) (Exhibit 32. On June 13, 2008, attorney Edwards agreed to represent E.W.; on July 2, 2008, tomes

ample upon the rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege — at least not in a civil setting.” Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. App. 1993). 2 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010567 --- PAGE BREAK --- using a vibrator and he also paid her $200 for each other under

a discussions and the right to confer with prosecutors about any plea arrangement). See 14 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010579 --- PAGE BREAK --- Affidavit of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at {1 - 2, §4 (hereinafter “Edwards Affidavit”) (Exhibit 32. On June 13, 2008, attorney Edwards agreed to represent E.W.; on July 2, 2008, attorney E

dwards Affidavit”) (Exhibit 32. On June 13, 2008, attorney Edwards agreed to represent E.W.; on July 2, 2008, attorn

e and punish Epstein for his crimes against them in whatever avenue remained open to them. On August 12, 2008, at the request of his client Jane Doe, Brad Edwards filed a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault of Jane Doe. See Edwards Affidavit, “N” at 7. Included in this c

m engaging in what was a blatant effort to extort Bradley Edwards, utilizing the nearly limitless resources of a ven

ample upon the rights of others and then escape the consequences by invoking a constitutional privilege - at least not in a civil setting." Fraser v. Security and Inv. Corp., 615 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 4* Dist. Ct. App. 1993). And, in the proper circumstances, «Silence is often evidence of the most persuasive character.'" F