Epstein Secrets

tion of Epstein's federal case, on July 3, 2008, attorney Edwards sent a letter to the U.S. Attorney's Office comm

stitutional principle of separation of powers. Attorneys and Law Firms *1198 Paul Cassell, University of Utah College of Law, SALT LAKE CITY, UT, Bradley James Edwards, EdwardsPottinger, LLC, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, for Petitioner. Richard Christian Komando, Bradley Garrison & Komando, ORANGE PARK, FL, for Amicus C

her. The U.S. Attorney's Office continued to conceal the existence of the NPA from all the victims for months to come. In mid- June *1233 of 2008, Bradley Edwards, the Fort Lauderdale, Florida attorney for several of Epstein's victims, contacted AUSA Villafana to inform her that he represented Jane Doe I and

for several of Epstein's victims, contacted AUSA Villafana to inform her that he represented Jane Doe I and, later, Jane Doe 2. AUSA Villafana and Edwards discussed the possibility of federal charges being filed against Epstein in the future. Edwards was led to believe that federal charges could stil

provisions. It Hardison v. Cohen, 375 F.3d 1262, 1266 (11th Cir. 2004); Nichols v. Ho per 173 F.3d 820, 824 (11th Cir. 1999); C e Ala. Hosp Ass'n v Beasley, 702 £2d 955, 962 (1 I th Cir. 1983) (in light of statutory violation, we "accordingly remand to the district court so that it may devise an appro

is raising, the Court must "take the factual allegations in the complaint as true and construe them in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs." Edwards v. Prime, Inc., 602 F.3d 1276, 1291 (11ih Cir. 2010). In the current posture of this case, the victims have pending a motion for "summary judgment"

ity to review this case. CONCLUSION The Court should deny the Government's motion to dismiss. DATED: December 5, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Te

rts to fashion appropriate equitable remedies when plaintiffs have proven a violation of statutory provisions. See, e.g., Alabama Hospital Ass'n v. Beasley, 702 F.2d 955, 962 (11th Cir. 1983) (in light of statutory violation, we "accordingly remand to the district court so that it may devise an appropr

appropriate equitable remedy."). And the CVRA is obviously "remedial legislation" that should be broadly construed to achieve its remedial purposes. Edwards. Kia Motors of America, Inc., 554 F.3d 943, 948 (11th Cir 2008). A good illustration of the broad power of district courts to remedy CVRA violation

ity to review this case. CONCLUSION The Court should deny the Government's motion to dismiss. DATED: December 5, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, UT \Ill A Tile UTOTAO 0. T M.TDIN A XT Tip T and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Ja

urts to fashion appropriate equitable remedies when plaintiffs have proven a violation of statutory provisions. See, e.g., Alabama Hospital Ass'nl. Beasley, 702 F.2d 955, 962 (11th Cir. 1983) (in light of statutory violation, we "accordingly remand to the district court so that it may devise an appropr

y the two Florida offenses. The judge left open what the possible remedy could bef1321 v. Epstein (2015) In a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Pa.ul G. Cassell meant for India the Crime Victims Rihis uit,[14°) (then known as , alleged in a sworn affidavit that at age 17, elae ha

n a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Pa.ul G. Cassell meant for India the Crime

1:361 *She was later given additional responsibility for mai-teeing opposition business in the House of Representatives by Latham, who had succeeded Beasley as Labor Party leader.WLA EFTA00262568 1ST Aire-me T (900 IN‘)c.n..A.e.D A Car.)SetP.ED LAW-1,ER ‘rnio %NIA:, IN--c.t.t.Zoir4nivitioAt.. 4 coh