Epstein Secrets

ntained, inter alia, in the attached affidavit of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. The victims have also concurrently filed itemize

ocket 08/16/2013 Page 9 of 10 DATED: August 16, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Flori

ims advanced by crime victims that federal prosecutors have violated their public responsibilities under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. See U.S. v. Arthur Young & Co., 465 U.S. 805, 817 (1984) (refusing to extend work product privilege to public accountants, because they have 'a public responsibility transcending

hen have 10 days to file a reply. A proposed order to that effect is attached to this pleading. DATED: August 1, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice I0 EFTA00208765 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 218 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2013 Pag

1, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell Pro Ha

aims advanced by crime victims that federal prosecutors have violated their public responsibilities under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. See U.S.,. Arthur Young & Co., 465 U.S. 805, 817 (1984) (refusing to extend work product privilege to public accountants, because they have "a public responsibility transcending

d JANE DOE No. 2 r. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I

ion of the materials at issue. DATED: August 16.2013 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Flori

ims advanced by crime victims that federal prosecutors have violated thcir public responsibilities under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. See U.S. v. Arthur Young & Co., 465 U.S. 805, 817 (1984) (refusing to extend work product privilege to public accountants, because they have 'a public responsibility transcending