Epstein Secrets

ntained, inter alia, in the attached affidavit of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. The victims have also concurrently filed itemize

ocket 08/16/2013 Page 9 of 10 DATED: August 16, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Flori

process privilege would be a qualified privilege, which would be overridden by the victims' compelling need to obtain the materials here. See, e.g., Newport Pac., Inc. v. County of San Diego, 200 F.R.D. 628, 638-41 (S.D. Cal. 2001) (in action charging county Board of Supervisors with violating Federal Fair

hen have 10 days to file a reply. A proposed order to that effect is attached to this pleading. DATED: August 1, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice I0 EFTA00208765 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 218 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2013 Pag

1, 2013 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell Pro Ha

rocess privilege would be a qualified privilege, which would be overridden by the victims' compelling need to obtain the materials here. See, e.g., Newport Pac., Inc.' County of San Diego, 200 F.R.D. 628, 638-41 (S.D. Cal. 2001) (in action charging County with violating the Federal Fair Housing Act, the pl

d JANE DOE No. 2 r. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I

ion of the materials at issue. DATED: August 16.2013 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Flori

process privilege would be a qualified privilege, which would be overridden by the victims' compelling need to obtain the materials here. See, e.g., Newport Pac., Inc. v. County of San Diego, 200 F.R.D. 628, 638-41 (S.D. Cal. 2001) (in action charging county Board of Supervisors with violating Federal Fair