Epstein Secrets

orldwide media for dissemination. We have seen similar tactics before. In prior civil litigation with Mr. Epstein, one of plaintiffs' lawyers, Mr. Edwards, through his counsel, filed a motion for summary judgment along with a statement of facts that was appended as an exhibit. The statement of facts it

es may be discoverable, negotiations are rarely admissible as evidence at trial. See, e.g., hi re MSTG, Inc., 675 F.3d 1337, 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2012); LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computes; Inc., 694 F.3d 51, 78 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (reversing district court for admitting settlement agreement at trial); Apple, Inc. v. Sa

ent from counsel. See Composite Exhibit 4. In a parallel article published in the Daily Business Review, Plaintiffs' counsel was quoted as follows: "Edwards said the -10- EFTA00605760 documents at this point will be disclosed only to the plaintiffs and will not become part of the public record." Id. (

Inc., No. 2:05cvl W.D. ( N.C. Sept. 12, 2006), 2006 U.S. Dist. (continued...) -5- EFTA00605755 rarely admissible as evidence at trial, see, e.g, LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computes; Inc., 694 F.3d 51, 78 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (reversing district court for admitting settlement agreement at trial); Apple, Inc. v. S

worldwide media for dissemination. We have seen similar tactics before. In prior civil litigation with Mr. Epstein, one of plaintiffs= lawyers, Mr. Edwards, through his counsel, filed a motion for summary judgment along with a statement of facts that was appended as an exhibit. The statement of facts

mes may be discoverable, negotiations are rarely admissible as evidence at trial. See, e.g., In re MSTG, Inc, 675 F.3d 1337, 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2012); LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc, 694 F.3d 51, 78 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (reversing district court for admitting settlement agreement at trial); Apple, Inc. v. Sa