Epstein Secrets

ters were provided to her both from your Affiant and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-deliver

e initially refused to speak with investigators. S.R.'s status as a victim of a federal offense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without identifying which of his clients is the purported victim. Accordingly, I will address facts relate

America Date Filed: 07/07/2008 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant represented by Bradley James Edwards 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Hollywood, FL 33020 954-414-8033 Fax: 924-1530 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICE

fense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without

NFORCEMENT OF CRIME VICTIM RIGHTS ACT, 18 U.S.C. & 3771 The United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Victim Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771, and states: I. THERE IS NO "COURT PROCEEDING" UNDER 18 U.S.C. 6 3771(b) Petitioner complains that she has been denied her righ

ESQUIRE Burman, rr4tfnn or al. 1 1 1 1 14 15 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2 2 On behalf of Third Party E.W. WILLIAM J. BERGER, ESQUIRE BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler On behalf of Third Party, The Post DEANNA SHULLMAN, ESQUIRE Thomas, LoCiero & EFTA00233769 Proceedings Jun

Ms. Shullman, good morning. Mr. Borger, gOOd morning. And Hr. Berger, your client is E -- HR. BERGER: E.W., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edward■ on behalf of E.N. as well, Judge. Thanks. EFTA00233748 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2

man, good morning. Mr. Borger, gOOd morning. And Hr. Berger, your client is E -- HR. BERGER: E.W., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edward■ on behalf of E.N. as well, Judge. Thanks. EFTA00233748 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

fense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without

NFORCEMENT OF CRIME VICTIM RIGHTS ACT, 18 U.S.C. 6 3771 The United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Victim Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771, and states: I. THERE IS NO "COURT PROCEEDING" UNDER 18 U.S.C. & 377I (b) Petitioner complains that she has been denied her rig

ters were provided to her both from your Affiant and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, and Your Affiant's letter to was provided by the FBI. (Ex. I ). Your A Mantis letter to III was hand-delivered by myself to at t

ed to provide notification to victims in the short time that they had. jj Although all known victims were not notified, AUSA Ilindid call attorney Edwards to provide notice to his clients regarding the hearing. AUSA did this, even though she had no obligation to provide notice of a state court hearing

fense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without

NFORCEMENT OF CRIME VICTIM RIGHTS ACT, 18 U.S.C. d 3771 The United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Victim Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771, and states: I. THERE IS NO "COURT PROCEEDING" UNDER 18 U.S.C. & 3771(b) Petitioner complains that she has been denied her righ

victim notification letters were provided to the victim by both the FBI Victim-Witness Specialist and AUSA Villafafa. ILI 3. Petitioner's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. and the let

rovide notification to victims in the short time that they had. 10, Although all known victims were not notified, AUSA Villafafia did call attorney Edwards to provide notice to his clients regarding the hearing. AUSA Villafafia did this, even though she had no obligation to provide notice of a state cou

N M. LARIMORE E RA U S LIST. CT. S.D. OF P.A. . wPB. The United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Victim Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771, and states: I. THERE IS NO "COURT PROCEEDING" UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3771(b) Petitioner complains that she has been denied her righ

identified, victim notification letters were provided to the victim by both the FBI Victim-Witness Specialist and AUSA al 3. Petitioner's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. and the let

mpted to provide notification to victims in the short time that they had. Id, Although all known victims were not notified, AUSA lid call attorney Edwards to provide notice to his clients regarding the hearing. AUSA id this, even though she had no obligation to provide notice of a state court hearing.

N M. LARIMORE E RA U S LIST. CT. S.D. OF P.A. . wPB. The United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Victim's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Victim Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771, and states: I. THERE IS NO "COURT PROCEEDING" UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3771(b) Petitioner complains that she has been denied her righ