Epstein Secrets

the Rights of Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Dear Dexter: First, as mentioned before, please feel free to call me "Siii rather than "Judge Cassell." Brad Edwards and I hope to build a close and friendly working relationship with you as we proceed with our efforts to protect victims' rights. Also, if you could

Doe #1's and Jane Doe #2's efforts that past year-and-a- half to obtain information from Epstein relevant to their CVRA case. And during that time, Bradley J. Edwards and I have had many formal (and informal) contacts with the U.S. Attorney's Office. Until yesterday, no one in the Office has ever suggested that we

lly request the same conferral rights that you gave Mr. Epstein with the First Assistant, the U.S. Attorney, and (if necessary) CEOS. Finally, Mr. Edwards and I stand ready to work with you to narrow the range of issues under consideration in this case. The newly-revealed e-mails appear to make it clea

(same); In re Dean (5th Cir. 2008) (same). Indeed, in an important case in the District of Montana involving enforcement of victims' rights in the W.R. Grace case, I proceeded in this fashion at the direction of the Justice Department (i.e., the U.S. Attorney for the District of Montana, with whom we were

tecting the Rights of Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Dear First, as mentioned before, please feel free to call me "Paul" rather than "Judge Cassell." Brad Edwards and I hope to build a close and friendly working relationship with you as we proceed with our efforts to protect victims' rights. Also, if ou copy

Doe #1's and Jane Doe #2's efforts that past year-and-a- half to obtain information from Epstein relevant to their CVRA case. And during that time, Bradley J. Edwards and I have had many formal (and informal) contacts with the U.S. Attorney's Office. Until yesterday, no one in the Office has ever suggested that we

lly request the same conferral rights that you gave Mr. Epstein with the First Assistant, the U.S. Attorney, and (if necessary) CEOS. Finally, Mr. Edwards and I stand ready to work with you to narrow the range of issues under consideration in this case. The newly-revealed e-mails appear to make it clea

(same); In re Dean (5th Cir. 2008) (same). Indeed, in an important case in the District of Montana involving enforcement of victims' rights in the W.R. Grace case, I proceeded in this fashion at the direction of the Justice Department (i.e., the U.S. Attorney for the District of Montana, with whom we were

uld choose the more expansive interpretation. Not only is the CVRA "remedial legislation" that should be broadly construed to achieve its purposes, Edwards v. Kia Motors of America, Inc., 554 F.3d 943, 948 (11th Cir 2008), but the sponsors of the CVRA stated that the right to confer was "intended to be

an appropriate briefing schedule and hold a hearing on the appropriate remedy for those violations. DATED: May 2, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, 27 EFTA00178083 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2011 Page 28 of 29

eed additional facts, evidence, or there's going to be a stipulation submitted to me upon which I can rely. MR. EDWARDS: Sure. Your Honor, this is Brad Edwards. I believe that you do have a sufficient record, in that I don't think that -- I think that we're in agreement that additional evidence does not ne

Federal prosecutors have used such group meetings in cases involving far larger numbers of victims, such as the Oklahoma City bombing case and the W.R. Grace case. See, e.g., United States v. W.R. Grace, 408 F.Supp.2d 998, 1016 (D. Mont. 2005) (Community Advisory Group set up in the town of Libby, Montan

uld choose the more expansive interpretation. Not only is the CVRA "remedial legislation" that should be broadly construed to achieve its purposes, Edwards. Kia Motors of America, Inc., 554 F.3d 943, 948 (11th Cir 2008), but the sponsors of the CVRA stated that the right to confer was "intended to be ex

an appropriate briefing schedule and hold a hearing on the appropriate remedy for those violations. DATED: May 2, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, 5/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER. JAFFE. WLETSSINrk 17 EFTA00208010 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2011 Page 28 of 2

Federal prosecutors have used such group meetings in cases involving far larger numbers of victims, such as the Oklahoma City bombing case and the W.R. Grace case. See, e.g., United States I. W.R. Grace, 408 F.Supp.2d 998, 1016 (D. Mont. 2005) (Community Advisory Group set up in the town of Libby, Montan