Epstein Secrets

d JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I

d Epstein held accountable the same way anyone else would be. I spoke about this with one of my friends around May 2008. I then called an attorney, Brad Edwards, around June 2008, understanding that he was hired to get the prosecutors to talk to us and hear the truth from me. That was especially important t

y other young teenagers to Epstein for the purpose of getting paid by Epstein. I wanted to assist the prosecutors in the investigation. I hired Mr. Edwards to let them know that I was cooperative and ready to tell them all of the helpful information I had. I understood that Mr. Edwards did that. I aut

ecutor disclosed the existence of the agreement, attorney Edwards could have taken steps to challenge the consummat

re the prosecution of Epstein — and the Government was assiduously trying to conceal the agreement it had reached with Epstein. See DE 361 at 31-39; Edwards Aff. of Aug. 11, 2017, at 11 11-19. All of the Government's arguments about what Jane Doe 2 was doing back in April 2007 have no relevance to that time

ed the case for investigation. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at 1 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration"). The Pa

ge of Law. During the call, Ms. Garvin was not advised that a non-prosecution agreement had been reached in this matter. 34. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted AUSA to inform her that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the f

lients regarding the hearing. AUSA did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida regarding the plea agreement that had been negotiated between them. See Attachment 1 to Edwards Aff. These e-mail disclosed for the first time the steps that had been taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office to avoid having the victims in the case lear

ed the case for investigation. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at 1 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration"). The Pa

ge of Law. During the call, Ms. Garvin was not advised that a non-prosecution agreement had been reached in this matter. 34. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted AUSA to inform her that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the f

lients regarding the hearing. AUSA did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida regarding the plea agreement that had been negotiated between them. See Attachment 1 to Edwards Aff. These e-mail disclosed for the first time the steps that had been taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office to avoid having the victims in the case lear

ce while we conduct a thorough investigation." The referenced letter made no disclosure about the NPA. Id. at 33, 1 99. In mid-June 2008, attorney Brad Edwards contacted the line prosecutor handling the case to inform her that he represented Jane Doe I. On June 27, 2008, Brad Edwards further informed the l

rm her that he represented Jane Doe I. On June 27, 2008, Brad Edwards further informed the line prosecutor that that he also represented Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to meet with the prosecutor to provide information about Epstein, hoping to secure a significant federal indictment against Epstein, consiste

As an exhibit to their response to the Government's summary judgment motion, the victims have filed a detailed affidavit from the victims' attorney, Bradley J. Edwards, about the nature of the calls that he had with the line prosecutor. See Edwards Aff. of Aug. II, 2017, at IN 11.25. If the Government fails to disp

filed a detailed affidavit from the victims' attorney, Bradley J. Edwards, about the nature of the calls that he had with the line prosecutor. See Edwards Aff. of Aug. II, 2017, at IN 11.25. If the Government fails to dispute that affidavit, of course that affidavit would provide additional evidence suppor