Epstein Secrets

ed the case for investigation. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at 1 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration"). The Pa

ge of Law. During the call, Ms. Garvin was not advised that a non-prosecution agreement had been reached in this matter. 34. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted AUSA to inform her that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the f

lients regarding the hearing. AUSA did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

made to the victims of the non-prosecution agreement. 14. On about September 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie revealed to an attorney (Bert Ocariz), who was under discussion to be a representative of victims of Epstein's sexual abuse, that a non-prosecution agreement was in the process of being

also investigating the case. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at & & 1-2 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration").

ane Doe #2 was represented by counsel that was paid for by the criminal target Epstein and, accordingly, all contact was made through that attorney. Edwards Declaration at & 5. 7. In and around September 2007, plea discussions took place between Jeffrey Epstein, represented by numerous attorneys (incl

lients regarding the hearing. AUSA did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

ntion was made to the victims of the non-prosecution agreement. 14. On about September 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney revealed to an attorney (Bert Ocariz), who was under discussion to be a representative of victims of Epstein's sexual abuse in civil litigation, that the government was in the process o

ed the case for investigation. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at 1 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration"). The Pa

ge of Law. During the call, Ms. Garvin was not advised that a non-prosecution agreement had been reached in this matter. 34. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted AUSA to inform her that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the f

lients regarding the hearing. AUSA did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

made to the victims of the non-prosecution agreement. 14. On about September 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie revealed to an attorney (Bert Ocariz), who was under discussion to be a representative of victims of Epstein's sexual abuse, that a non-prosecution agreement was in the process of being

also investigating the case. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at & & 1-2 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration").

ane Doe #2 was represented by counsel that was paid for by the criminal target Epstein and, accordingly, all contact was made through that attorney. Edwards Declaration at & 5. 7. In and around September 2007, plea discussions took place between Jeffrey Epstein, represented by numerous attorneys (incl

ents regarding the hearing. AUSA a did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

ntion was made to the victims of the non-prosecution agreement. 14. On about September 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney revealed to an attorney (Bert Ocariz), who was under discussion to be a representative of victims of Epstein's sexual abuse in civil litigation, that the government was in the process o

nvestigating the-ease Epstein. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at && 1-2 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration").

agreed-to-seek no more less than $150,000 in damages against Epstein — an amount that Epstein argued later was limited to no more than $50,000). See Edwards Declaration, Exhibit "C" (copy of the non-prosecution agreement). The agreement was signed by Epstein and his legal counsel, as well as the U.S. At

s-Deelaration-at-&-1-47 AUSA strongly encouraged Attorney Edwards and his client to attend and address the Court a

Lefleowitt-te-the-LITSnactterfter fer-the-Seuthern-Distriet-ef Flerida, Le1kewi stated that ASUA had "assidueusly" hidden frem him the fact that Bert Ocariz was a friend of -beyffienel,1478rAuemeyls-Gefespendenee-at-267, If aeettrate-tembeyffiendue-desenbe-whe-had-reeemmended-Geana—M-at-268-Lefleavvitz

ted May 30, 2008, RE: , (2 pages); Author: Twiller Smith, Victim Specialist, Federal Bureau of Investigation, West Palm Beach, Florida. Letter to Brad Edwards, Esq., dated July 9, 2008, RE: Jeffrey Epstein/C.W.: Notification of Identified Victim (2 pages); Author: A. Marie Villafana. Letter to Brad Edward

ation, West Palm Beach, Florida. Letter to Brad Edwards, Esq., dated July 9, 2008, RE: Jeffrey Epstein/C.

07 11:49 a.m., RE: One more thing (2 pages) E-mail, Marie Villafana to Jay Lefkowitz, dated September 27, 2007 10:52 a.m., RE Conference Call with Bert Ocariz (1 page) 6 EFTA00191191 E-mail, Jay Leflcowitz to Marie Villafana, dated September 27, 2007 10:57 a.m., RE: Conference call with Bert Ocariz (2

tes District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehr

Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 E-mail: brad@Dathtoi

ling and negotiation this portion of the Agreement. The lirst major obstacle was a direct result of Ms. Villufana's improper attempt to appoint, Mr. Bert Ocariz. a close, person friend of her boyfriend's for the role of attorney representative. We of in the strongest terms to such an appointment due to our

im's Reply to Opposition to Victim's Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement in Jane Doe No. 1, et aL v. M., 08-80736; 2) 10/9/2008 letter from Edwards48 tee: false statements by the government; and 3) 10/15/2008 letter from Edwards to ■ re: whether Epstein violated the non-prosecution agreement 2

t 106. 9/26/2007, 11:49 am Emails between and Lefkowitz re: options for representative 107. 9/27/2007, 10:52 am Email from to Lefkowitz re: Bert Ocariz 108. 9/27/2007, 11:08 am Emails between and Lefkowitz re: Bert Ocariz 109. 9/27/2007, 3:06 pm Emails between and Lefkowitz re: Bert Ocariz