Epstein Secrets

nvestigating the-ease Epstein. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at ¶¶ 1-2 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration").

agreed-to-seek no mere less than $150,000 in damages against Epstein — an amount that Epstein argued later was limited to no more than $50,000). See Edwards Declaration, Exhibit "C" (copy of the non-prosecution agreement). The agreement was signed by Epstein and his legal counsel, as well as the U.S. At

ht the Importance of Vi.. Page 3 of 3 Lauderdale, Florida 33301 and may be reached at (800)400-1098 or (964) 624- 2820 Additional information about Brad Edwards or Farmer, Jaffe, Welssing, Edwards, Fistos 8 Lehrman. P.L. may be obtained from the fires webalte at swAv palhlotustIce com. FAQ4 I Contact Us I

iem-at—II—Ph AUSA Villafafia strongly encouraged Attorney Edwards and his client to attend and address the Court a

ue lacl hither •"(psardrrerSoUng corn •-•"" Source : BARD WrIrerlog Cit/Town Fon La, deroale • SlouilA - Muted SLISIC 111OUSPt : Loser Tags : Brae Edwards. Jeffrey Epstein. Cruno V•ctrus Rights, Ulmer one urasono shortcut : prlog oriel 2313086 0111C111111111: 1$$ UOI1 011110 ;1101.. 101041.US are SI.

her cooperation with the investigation and contacted other potential witnesses and victims to advise them against cooperating with the authorities. Edwards Declaration at ¶ 5. 7. In and around September 2007, plea discussions took place between Jeffrey Epstein, represented by numerous attorneys (including lead cr

ed the case for investigation. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at 1 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration"). The Pa

ge of Law. During the call, Ms. Garvin was not advised that a non-prosecution agreement had been reached in this matter. 34. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted AUSA to inform her that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the f

lients regarding the hearing. AUSA did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

ion of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at 1 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration"). The Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office was investigating the case. Edwards Declaration at 1. 3. The FBI determined that both Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 were victims of sexual assaults by Epstein while they were minors beginning when

also investigating the case. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at & & 1-2 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration").

ane Doe #2 was represented by counsel that was paid for by the criminal target Epstein and, accordingly, all contact was made through that attorney. Edwards Declaration at & 5. 7. In and around September 2007, plea discussions took place between Jeffrey Epstein, represented by numerous attorneys (incl

lients regarding the hearing. AUSA did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

n agreement. Edwards Declaration at & 15. 40. On July 9, 2008, AUSA sent a victim notification to Jane Doe #1 via her attorney, Bradley Edwards. Edwards Declaration, Exhibit "H." That notification contains a written explanation of some of the terms of the agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office

ed the case for investigation. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at 1 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration"). The Pa

ge of Law. During the call, Ms. Garvin was not advised that a non-prosecution agreement had been reached in this matter. 34. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted AUSA to inform her that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the f

lients regarding the hearing. AUSA did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

ion of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at 1 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration"). The Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office was investigating the case. Edwards Declaration at 1. 3. The FBI determined that both Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 were victims of sexual assaults by Epstein while they were minors beginning when

also investigating the case. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at & & 1-2 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration").

ane Doe #2 was represented by counsel that was paid for by the criminal target Epstein and, accordingly, all contact was made through that attorney. Edwards Declaration at & 5. 7. In and around September 2007, plea discussions took place between Jeffrey Epstein, represented by numerous attorneys (incl

ents regarding the hearing. AUSA a did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

n agreement. Edwards Declaration at & 15. 40. On July 9, 2008, AUSA sent a victim notification to Jane Doe #1 via her attorney, Bradley Edwards. Edwards Declaration, Exhibit "H." That notification contains a written explanation of some of the terms of the agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office

nvestigating the-ease Epstein. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at && 1-2 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration").

agreed-to-seek no more less than $150,000 in damages against Epstein — an amount that Epstein argued later was limited to no more than $50,000). See Edwards Declaration, Exhibit "C" (copy of the non-prosecution agreement). The agreement was signed by Epstein and his legal counsel, as well as the U.S. At

s-Deelaration-at-&-1-47 AUSA strongly encouraged Attorney Edwards and his client to attend and address the Court a

n—agreement7 Edwards Declaration at & 15. 40. On July 9, 2008, AUSA sent a victim notification to Jane Doe #1 via her attorney, Bradley Edwards. Edwards Declaration, Exhibit "H." That notification contains a written explanation of some of the terms of the agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office