Epstein Secrets

mber: 81 Docket Text: RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Jane Doe II. (Garcia, Isidro) 9:09-n-80469-KAM Notice has been electronically mailed to: Bradley James Edwards [email protected], [email protected] Bruce Reinhart e Denise Kalland Isidro Manuel Garcia Jack Alan Goldberger Michael James Pike N

has been electronically mailed to: Bradley James Edwards [email protected], [email protected]

limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Garcia, Isidro on 7/2/2010 at 1:57 PM EDT and filed on 7/2/2010 Case Name: Doe III Epstein et al Case Number: 9:09-cv-80469-ICAM Filer: Jane Doe II Document

l Case Number: 9:09-cv-80469-ICAM Filer: Jane Doe II Document Number: 81 Docket Text: RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Jane Doe II. (Garcia, Isidro) 9:09-n-80469-KAM Notice has been electronically mailed to: Bradley James Edwards [email protected], [email protected] Bruce Reinhart

Defendant Class Code: CLOSED Closed: Yes Statute: 28:1331 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Demand Amount: $0 NOS Description: Personal Injury Attorneys Bradley James Edwards [COR LD NTC] Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos 8. Lehrman PL 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale , FL 33301 USA 954-524-2820 Fax:

m P. Dimitrouleas on 9/21/2010. (lk) (Entered: 09/21/2010) STRICKEN CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by M. J. Proof of Service Summons on Defendant, Epstein (Edwards. Bradley) Modified on 11/3/2010 (Is). (Stricken per DE #10) (Entered: 10/29/2010) STRICKEN CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by M. J. Proof of Service of Subp

d: 05/05/2010) 05/06/2010 538 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kenneth A. Marra: Status Conference held on 5/6/2010. Adam Horowitz, Bradley Edwards. Katherine Ezell for Plaintiff and Michael Pike, Robert Critton for Defendant. Court Reporter: Stephen Franklin. 561-514-3768 / Stephen_Franklin@fls

ension of Time to File Response as to 13 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 ComplaintDefendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint by Jane Doe II. (Garcia, Isidro) (Entered: 05/15/2009) ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot 16 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's response is due

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2009 Page 17 of 18 Respectfully Submitted, Plaintiff, by One of Her Counsel, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone

Senator Kerry refers to the statutorily imposed damage amount as "penalties." Id. The cases of U.S. v. Siegel, supra (11th Cir. 1998), and U.S. v. Edwards, supra (3d Cir. 1998), also support Defendant's position that application of the current version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 would be in clear violation of

ension of Time to File Response as to B Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 ComplaintDefendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint by Jane Doe II. (Garcia, Isidro) (Entered: 05/15/2009) 05/19/2009 17 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot j Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs re

y Contingent beneficianes 10000% Katie Vaughan-Edwards (100 00%) Cne700080C65ITS26NeT0C0302I9900004 031

tearing These finds am payable teen your demand. Ibis total o ec1dden the curia periodclang man Lending infiameation Fa dueled Manton on the freWs Isidro ashen ad automat, refs to >cm Clore Retehonshp Agnomen! a Amite Aceetreent atlte Genital Tents and ~tons LOS Staler em of Credit Pranks amiable n