Epstein Secrets

that, should CEOS reject Epstein's objections to the agreement, then U.S. Attorneys Correspondence at 290-91. 39. On May 30, 2008, another of Mr. Edwards's clients who was recognized as an Epstein victim by the U.S. Attorney's Office, received a letter from the FBI advising her that "Mk case is curre

gal counsel. In May 2008, the Office sent a similar letter stating "your case is currently investigation" to another victim (represented by attorney Bradley J. Edwards). As late as the middle of June 2008 — more than eight months after the non-prosecution agreement had been signed — the Assistant U.S. Attorney han

l had provided. The U.S. Attorney's Office called attorney Edwards to provide notice to his clients regarding the h

ardless of the attorney's subjective intentions, the conduct was unreasonable and vexatious when measured against an objective standard." Hudson v. Int 1 Comp. Negotiations, Inc., 499 F.3d 1252, 1262 (111h Cir. 2007). EFTA00230005 • • • Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 79.1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/

that, should CEOS reject Epstein's objections to the agreement, then U.S. Attorneys Correspondence at 290-91. 39. On May 30, 2008, another of Mr. Edwards's clients who was recognized as an Epstein victim by the U.S. Attorney's Office, received a letter from the FBI advising her that "Mk case is curre

gal counsel. In May 2008, the Office sent a similar letter stating "your case is currently investigation" to another victim (represented by attorney Bradley J. Edwards). As late as the middle of June 2008 — more than eight months after the non-prosecution agreement had been signed — the Assistant U.S. Attorney han

l had provided. The U.S. Attorney's Office called attorney Edwards to provide notice to his clients regarding the h

egardless of the attorney's subjective intentions, the conduct was unreasonable and vexatious when measured against an objective standard." Hudson' Int 1 Comp. Negotiations, Inc., 499 F.3d 1252, 1262 (111h Cir. 2007). 3 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000759 EFTA00230583 • • • Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 79.1

counsel for the United States. Assistant United States Attorney Dexter Lee reported that the United States does not oppose the Motion to Intervene. Bradley Edwards, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs reported that they oppose the Motion to Intervene. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Bruce E. Reinhart BRUCE E. REINHART,

any of Epstein's attorneys. 18. Prior to the filing of Plaintiff's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, neither Mr. Edwards, nor Judge Ca.qgell, nor anyone on their behalf contacted me to determine if the allegations in Paragraphs 52 and 53 of that Motion were true. I d

ardless of the attorney's subjective intentions, the conduct was unreasonable and vexatious when measured against an objective standard." Hudson v. Int 1 Comp. Negotiations, Inc., 499 F.3d 1252, 1262 (11th Cir. 2007). 3 EFTA00205046 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 79-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/201

any of Epstein's attorneys. 18. Prior to the filing of Plaintiff's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, neither Mr. Edwards, nor Judge Ca.qgell, nor anyone on their behalf contacted me to determine if the allegations in Paragraphs 52 and 53 of that Motion were true. I d

ardless of the attorney's subjective intentions, the conduct was unreasonable and vexatious when measured against an objective standard." Hudson v. Int 1 Comp. Negotiations, Inc., 499 F.3d 1252, 1262 (11th Cir. 2007). 3 EFTA00205077 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 79-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/201