Epstein Secrets

message. Thank you. Original Message From: Paul Cassell Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:29 PM To: N. (USAFLS)'; (USAFLS)'; (USAFLS)' Cc: 'Brad Edwards' Subject: RE: Redacted Pleading Rather than Sealing the Entire Pleading Dear Mr. I am writing as co-counsel in the Jane Doe case. I understand that

To: I. (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Discovery Issues in Epstein Dear

admit that thought is also making me feel a little bit under the weather. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:35 PM To: Bentle , USAFLM) Cc: I. (USAFLS); M, (USAFLS Greenberg, Benjamin (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I. Enited States We're on for

ly at 1:30 to make sure we're on the same page and then call him? Is there any reason why we need to make this a scheduled conference call including Edwards, or should we just initiate the call to Cassell and let him decide if he wants to postpone it to bring in Edwards? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda D

over? I admit that thought is also making me feel a little bit under the weather. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:35 PM To: USAFLM Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe Enited States Cc: .(USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) We're on for 1:30 tomorrow. I'll set

ly at 1:30 to make sure we're on the same page and then call him? Is there any reason why we need to make this a scheduled conference call including Edwards, or should we just initiate the call to Cassell and let him decide if he wants to postpone it to bring in Edwards? From: . I. (USAFLS) Sent: Thu

mit that thought is also making me feel a little bit under the weather. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 7:35 PM To: Bentley, (USAFLM) EFTA00206135