Epstein Secrets

eries13 that specifically targeted news articles from the case that addressed the defaming statements (e.g., Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley 2 Edwards lawsuit) to retrieve a set of articles that directly related to the defaming statements". I employed a modified snowball technique1s, starting with

N 1. I have been retained by the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA. to provide expert analysis and opinion on behalf of Mr. Bradley J. Edwards in the case originally styled Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff, vs. Scott Rothstein, individually, Mr. Bradley J. Edwards, individually, and'. M., indivi

ion, I have been asked to respond to the following question: 9. What is the level of dissemination of defaming statements associating Mr. Bradley J Edwards with the illegal activities of Mr. Scott Rothstein as a result of Mr. Jef•ey Epstein's lawsuit against Mr. Edwards? 3 EFTA00601579 10. For brev

an Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST 2012), p.1- 10. 26-30 October. Baltimore, MD. Carman, S., Strong, R., Chandra, A.., Oh, S., Spangler, S., Anderson, and Jansen, B.J. (2012) Predictive Value of Comments in the Service Engagement Process. 75th Annual Meeting of the American Society

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendants. 50 2009 CA 0 b 0 3 MOUE 4) COPY RECEIVED FOR HUNG DEC u ( 2008 sriesnoN Ii poCK COMPLAINT p

nt, ROTHSTEIN and Stuart Rosenfeldt, are and were the principal owners of equity in RRA and each co-founded RRA. 6. Defendant, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS ("EDWARDS"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, EDWA

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

in the following corporations and entities: a. 29 Bahia LLC; b. 235 GC LW; c. 350 LOP#2840 LLC; d. 353 BR LLC; e. 10630 #110 LLC; f. 708 Spangler u.,o, g. 1012 Broward LLC; h. 1198 Dixie LLC; 1. 1299 Federal LLC; j. 2133 IP LLC; k. 15158 LLC; I. AANG LLC; 28 EFTA00729467 Case 0:

ing reasons, the Court should deny this Crime Victims' Rights Act case. DATED: May 17, 2011 7 motion to intervene in Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 EFTA00205017 Joseph L

ervene in Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, an

ontribute to the litigation. Department of Fair Employment and Housing I. Lucent Technologies, Inc., 2011 WL 1549232, at *6 (9th Cir. 2011) (citing Spangler. Pasadena City Bd. of Educ., 552 F.2d 1326(9th Cir.1977). Here, there is no indication that the Justice Department will do anything other than vigo

asons, the Court should deny Reinhart's motion to intervene in this Crime Victims' Rights Act case. DATED: May 16.2011 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 6 EFTA00795279 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 81 Entered on FLSD

is Crime Victims' Rights Act case. DATED: May 16.2011 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 6 EFTA00795279 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)16.2011 Page 7 of 8 and Paul G. Cassell P

ontribute to the litigation. Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., 2011 WL 1549232, at *6 (9th Cir. 2011) (citing Spangler v. Pasadena City Bd. of Educ., 552 F.2d 1326(9th Cir.1977). Here, there is no indication that the Justice Department will do anything other than v

he statement amid confusion and criticism. According to the article, Johnson's office later clarified that he had been referring to comments made by Brad Edwards, an attorney for several Epstein victims, who said Trump helped him investigate Epstein more than a decade ago but did not confirm any law enforceme

t he had been referring to comments made by Brad Edwards, an attorney for several Epstein victims, who sai

bberies in the area. Back to Top CYBER DIVISION Letter Purportedly From Rep. Moolenaar Was Chinese Hacking Attempt The Detroit Free Press (09/08, Spangler) reported that the FBI and U.S. Capitol Police are investigating a suspected Chinese hacking attempt involving a fake email sent under U.S. Rep. Joh