Epstein Secrets

cedures. I don't remember saying anything different in this case. I did not see any FBI letters in this case prior to collecting the FBI letters to Brad Edwards' clients in connection with the Jane Doe I United States litigation. I did not instruct the FBI to include the language about the case being under in

y Circuit Court (Exhibit B-41). I responded, acknowledging his representation (Exhibit B-42). On June 18, 2008, I liv received a call from attorney Brad ards, who told me that he represented Individual #43, who is also Jane Doe #1 in the Jane Doe United States lawsuit. Mr. Edwards expressed an interest

a call from attorney Brad ards, who told me that he represented Individual #43, who is also Jane Doe #1 in the Jane Doe United States lawsuit. Mr. Edwards expressed an interest in assisting with the case. We were still waiting to hear about whether we would be moving " On the State side, Lefkowitz has

application of the law to different defendants and defense attorneys has resulted in a call for the resignation of the AUSA who dared to challenge the Executive Office's conclusions. I find that very disheartening. However, my first and only concern in this case (and my other child exploitation cases) is the victims

United States litigation, asserting that his clients wanted to 4 1 few days after Jeffrey Epstein entered his guilty plea in state court, attorney Brad Edwards filed suit on behalf of one of the victims identified in the federal investigation (later expanded to include I second victim who had been identifie

ng aside the NPA would not benefit his clients, and he sued Epstein on behalf of I number of victims under the NPA. I did what I could to assist Mr. Edwards, other attorneys, including Mr. Josefsberg, the attorney selected by the Special Master, and the Court, to locate victims, provide signed copies of

the a plication of the law to different defendants and defense attorneys has resulted in I call for the resignation of the who dared to challenge the Executive Office's conclusions. I find that very disheartening. However, my first and only concern in this case (and my other child exploitation cases) is the victims

DDITIONAL PERSONAL INFORMATION SSN DOB Gender LexID(sm) 090-44-XXXX 111953 Male 000752546965 (Age 64) Subject Summary Name Variations 1: EDWARDS. JEFFERY 2: EPSTEIN, J 3: EPSTEIN, JEFFERY 4: EPSTEIN, JEFFERY E 5: EPSTEIN, JEFFREY 6: EPSTEIN. JEFFREY E 7: EPSTEIN. JERRERY 8: EPSTI

nal version, responsive, chain, grand jury, crime victims, federal government, non-prosecution, investigative COUNSEL: Mi For Jane Doe, Petitioner: Bradley James Edwards, LEAD ATTORNEY, Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL, Fort Lauderdale, FL; Jay C. Howell, PRO HAC VICE, Jay Howell & Associates PA, Ja

or the Southern District of Florida and the Executive Office of United States Attorneys. (DE 212-1 at 22-23); (see Table at P-013248-13278). One of the Executive Office's functions is to "[p]rovide general legal interpretations, opinions, and advice to United States Attorneys in areas of recusals." Offices of the Uni